As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to
think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The above the statement claims that people’s reliance on technology is proportional to their ability to think I slightly agree and partially disagree with the opinion.
It is true that if we look around, we find some form of modern devices. We wake up on ringing of the alarm of our mobile phones. We heat the breakfast in a microwave oven and leave for workplace in a hybrid car. Our hands are always preoccupied with iPhone. Before we fall asleep, we switch on inverter-based air conditioners. It is very factually correct that in the present World, human lives and technology are closely tangled together. However, the effect of these modern changes on daily lives and a human’s core-ability, to be to think and comprehend, it the most debatable current dilemma.
The silicon circuits can have adverse impact on lives of many. A three-year-old is often given a tablet my her mother to keep her engaged. She switches it on starts playing games such ‘tea party’. Instead of building the scenario in her mind stimulating her creativity, she would be assisted by software tool that display graphics.
Many youngsters are highly dependent on their calculators. They would process complex trigonometric functions on the device, but without it they will fail to respond to simple multiplication question. A cashier at a supermarket will spent her entire day scanning the merchandised being sold to sum up the total bill. But if her desktop malfunctions, she will be unable to determine the total receivables.
On the other hand, the advancement in science and technology has proven beneficial for many. With advert for braille keyboards and printers the visually impaired are able to pursue degrees. Many not-for-profit organizations are running remote classrooms to teach students in underprivileged rural areas. The video conferencing has enabled doctors and researchers from different parts of the world to create forums to discuss the recent practices and devise better treatment plans for their severely critical patients.
In the competition to offer next generation services to the customers, the employee of the tech corporates are concentrating their everyday work hours to create and design something new. This is now new enablers for discoveries in the disciplines of science and engineering.
Since, the industries are automated, the workforce is not employed for redundant jobs such as screwing bottle caps or data-entry. The machines handle such petty tasks and employees rather focus on more critical jobs such as improving processes to raise efficiency and decrease probability of errors.
The inventions of new gadgets have revolutionized the World. A fraction of the population has taken the convenience to their disadvantage by relying totally on them, while others are most ripping benefits to change their lives and of those around them for betterment. Therefore, if these technologies have proved constructive or destructive depends on what use these put on to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...estion. A cashier at a supermarket will spent her entire day scanning the merchandise...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, such as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 475.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33473684211 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1017650234 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614736842105 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.466716373 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8518518519 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5925925926 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134454250148 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281184358372 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028647720867 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527379144362 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289624779466 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 100.480337079 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.