The concept of free will is a fallacy. Many actions are not the product of choice; thus, people should not be held responsible for them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement states that the concept of free will is rife with gaps since many actions undertaken are not resulted from one’s direct choice, rather people are forced upon to do so. I agree with the topic.
Apparently, how one acts out during our everyday life or under special circumstance depends on what we choice to do. But this is what it seems when view from a distance.
At supermarket, one customer might shout on a shopkeeper since he felt he was dealing with them rudely. On the other hand the second would complain in normal but firm tone.
In a locality, one woman would keep up with domestic abuse as she would want to continue her marriage, compromising her self-respect, while her neighbor would file for divorce after she finds her husband is abusive with her since she would not to be treated that way.
A fifth grader concentrates during lecture and clears exam in flying colors. His classmate who had not paid attention to studies ended up repeating the year.
In all the case, people act the way they feel appropriate and suitable. However, if you closely look at the bigger picture, their conducts are often dictated by their background, which are not chosen by these people themselves, but are pushed into by other around them.
Now, the person who acted out loudly at supermarket might have not been to school as for his family education was never priority. The second person who behaved in civilized manner might be a professional and belongs to a family of intellects. Now these two men never chose their families but rather were born there.
The two women who took different measures while they found themselves stuck in abusive relationship could be because the prior one might not be educated enough to take they charge if breadwinner to support her children and therefore decided to remain silent for what seems to her their betterment. The latter could be financial independent woman, brought up in a setup where female are aware of their rights. These two women never chose the kind of upbringing they received from their parents.
The performance of the two pupil of the same class might be different since the first child might be getting care, love and attention of his parents, while the second one is housed with a dysfunctional family. Now, neither of the children opted for their respective homes.
Even though, at first glance it might seems people have free will and act how they choose to deal with the conditions. But, taking a microscopic view, one observes the acts are conditional responses. People’s conduct are reflection of what surrounds them rather than own will.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'since the felt'?
Suggestion: since the felt
...ne customer might shout on a shopkeeper since he felt he was dealing with them rudely. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, as for, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88169642857 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55611351832 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569196428571 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8729366657 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4090909091 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.97078651685 201% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141011799846 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396278399933 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472245188096 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601646474415 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598374388393 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.