Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
These days, having proficiency in a specific field is necessary for finding a job and being prospective. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among people whether specialization is essential for judgment of work in a particular sphere or not. Some people believe that every persons can express their ideas about different topics. Others, however, advocate the idea that expressing opinions necessitate being proficient. I personally, concur with the former. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, advancement in technology provides a great deal of information with the public and ordinary people. Today, people can be specialists in different fields because they can gather enough knowledge and information from different sources such as the internet, books, and newspaper to name but a few, as opposed to the past when people had to attend to university to attain a specific knowledge and only specific individuals were aware of special spheres. Therefore, people can be jack-of-all-trades and know about different field to some extent because of their accessibility to different sources. By doing so, their opinion can be very invaluable and help others to solve problems. For example, in today's modern world, parents are up-to-date and sophisticated, so their offspring can consult them about their problems and dilemmas. In other words, having well-educated parents obviate the need for consulting with a specialist or advisor in educational issues which costs a lot because parents’ idea is enough for youngsters to rely on.
Secondly, some people's opinions has a great value because they have a wide perspective, although they do not have an academic background. In addition to having expertise, inherent talents to analyze issues is essential. some people have a great perspective in analysis of different situations that can help people who seek their advice. This clearly demonstrates that experts are not the only persons who their viewpoints are invaluable.
Some people may advocate the idea that experts are only persons who can judge a given issue on the ground that they spend a lot of time on studying this issue and have enough experience about different aspects of work. In my opinion, combining different ideas from different individuals, including experts, experienced and trustful people, ordinary people result in the best decision and conclusion and people should not rely too much on specialist. This is because, they are human beings like us and they can make a mistake in their point of view. Considering different person’s ideas prevents disastrous mistakes in important issues.
To sum up, I really believe that every person’s opinion can be effective and beneficial on the ground that technology provide a lot of information with people and some people with a low educational level have some innate abilities to analyze problems even better than some experts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...talents to analyze issues is essential. some people have a great perspective in anal...
^^^^
Line 17, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems even better than some experts.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2525.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41845493562 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99579500471 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527896995708 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4637363918 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.238095238 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1904761905 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61904761905 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079655565436 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268373013392 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243135959852 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482357415789 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149580232639 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.