Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The work in any field is subject to judgement both from experts in the field and lay people. This can cause confusion within society when evaluating each type of criticism. Critical judgement from nonexperts lack the experience and knowledge base that the experts possess.
The inexperience of the masses within a given field is key flaw in making judgements of a field. This inexperience causes lay people to misunderstand the context each field is in. Evidence of this can be seen in economics. When the head of the federal reserve choses to keep the interest rates, they do because their years of experience as a head of a federal reserve bank in their region. This experience is more valuable than the desires and analysis of investors who are posting on their blog. The inexperience of a common person causes the judgements to be trivial to the public.
The lack of study of the relevant literature regarding the field can cause a person not in a field to make uncritical judgements. Economics is a field that showcases this fact perfectly. While protestors march for raises in the minimum wage, they do not know the economic impact that this policy would have on them. If they had read some of the papers on minimum wage in economic journals, they would realize that they see the number of hours at their jobs cut. They would also see that companies would hire more part time workers rather than full time workers.
Evaluating a field of knowledge is tricky for everyone. This occurs since the mass and the experts can have vastly criticisms from each other. However, critical judgements from lay people do not hold the same power as an expert since they do not possess the time in the subject or the knowledge of the subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cy would have on them. If they had read some of the papers on minimum wage in economic jour...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...also see that companies would hire more part time workers rather than full time workers. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...hire more part time workers rather than full time workers. Evaluating a field of know...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76821192053 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53827332152 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493377483444 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2178587915 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.7058823529 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29411764706 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135740712495 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541225433393 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611644616161 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998706223421 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469956694546 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.