Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is most likely that all of us are dealing with some critical statements during our period of education or at work environment. First of all, I want to be clear that I would consider the critics regarding the professional actions not the moral ones in this essay since our attitudes to conceptual subjects are effected through many factors such as culture, religious, and etc. The prompt has claimed that judgmental statements regarding a specific topic are valuable in terms of declaring by people who are conversant with that. I mostly agree with this idea because of two important reasons.
To begin, I want to make clear the meaning of the "expert". I certainly apply this word to people who possess both adequate academic knowledge and job experience regarding their fields. Thus their comments may have high value for the advancement since they have enough information to amend the technical errors and also in favor of having many years of experience, they would try out many trials and errors to solve the problems occurred. I should mention again that empirical and theoretical knowledge are supplementary, and therefore as much as one of these factors is going to be pallid, the value of the comment is going to be lower. For example, as an apprentice student in medical subject, someone is eager to learn the related subjects from a famous surgeon who has published many papers and done many surgeries during his/ her working life instead of following invalid instructions of his/her colleagues during the launch time. The above example illustrate that how much the combination of information and practices make reproving statements valid to consider.
Furthermore, there is a pivotal subject regarding the process of improving called "critical thinking". In this method, the stereotypes or personal opinion do not take into account at all. Since, these statements would consider as a negative point in the process of solving problems and most of them are like baby complaining about the situation. Instead, using critical thinking allows a group to deal with some questionable judgments about their project and see the paucity of their jobs and develop the solution through the expert s' guidelines in various of stages. An a clear example, the thinking room in many companies and institutions have been established to consider the various aspect of an issue through hearing adept viewpoints.
Some may argue that accepting the ideas of people who think out of the box- a metaphor of that their approaches are not restricted by rules and putative believes- are commensurate to develop creativity. For instance, Toyota has been adapted its customer 's opinion regarding trivial subjects meanwhile the are driving. The Toyota has adapted this method to evaluate the consumer perception through a non professional statements and turned them into improving technologies. So, to this kine of attitude about critical judgment you likely do not want to hear technical issues that the technicians have mentioned before, but you are following the novel ideas that are not similar fro your ears.
To sum up, adapting reprimands declaring by pundits and professional in a specific field would likely be more beneficial to improve our actions since they have experienced both theoretical and empirical issues and test various method as solutions. Furthermore, in solving problem a reliable judgments is more important than sporadic ideas. However, the importance of new opinions is not deniable in increasing the level of creativity, its impact is not significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...any factors such as culture, religious, and etc. The prompt has claimed that judgmental ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...word to people who possess both adequate academic knowledge and job experience re...
^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... job experience regarding their fields. Thus their comments may have high value for ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...os;. In this method, the stereotypes or personal opinion do not take into account at all. Since,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'An' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: An; A
...pert s guidelines in various of stages. An a clear example, the thinking room in man...
^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...gh hearing adept viewpoints. Some may argue that accepting the ideas of people who ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...re not restricted by rules and putative believes- are commensurate to develop creativity...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on regarding trivial subjects meanwhile the are driving. The Toyota has adapted this me...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 677, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ng the novel ideas that are not similar fro your ears. To sum up, adapting reprim...
^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'judgment'?
Suggestion: judgment
...thermore, in solving problem a reliable judgments is more important than sporadic ideas. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3014.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24173913043 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93558520426 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 946.8 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8888497624 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1363636364 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141607235505 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371222977594 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323625219065 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760537844128 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263377834747 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 100.480337079 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.