Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that critical judgment of work in any field is valuable only when it is given by expert in that field. This statement appears to be logical at first glance, however, I firmly disagree with it. I shall explore in the following essay
To begin with, the statement seems to believe that opinions from normal people are worthless. However, everyone’s opinions is important can it’s always to take theirs into consideration. For example, a tennis beginner may learn from his or her friends who are better in terms of techniques instead of hiring a professional players as a coach. Apparently, amateur tennis players are not as skillful as professional players do, but they have basic knowledge in this field and they are definitely qualified to provide opinions and share experiences with others. Therefore, I believe people can offer critical judgment as the experts can do in any field.
Additionally, when it comes to providing critical judgment, experts usually be rambling and not affable since they have developed great amount of knowledge, they cannot realize that normal people don’t view the world as they do. On the contrary, what other people can provide is sometimes more acceptable and colloquial due to the limited knowledge of a given field. For example, a famous poet may provide a long, dull review with nothing but an over usage of unscrupulous words, phrases and complex writing structure. This review may be considered breathtaking among critics but certainly a banal to normal people. Consequently, the judgment made under such circumstance appears to be dull and meaningless to most of the majority.
Admittedly, some may argue that critical judgment from experts in any field is valuable since they are well-trained and full of great insights into their specialties. For example, Gordon Ramsay, one of the most famous chef from the UK, is notoriously renowned for its brutally honest yet insightful comments. Because of him expertise in culinary, he is able to notice even a minor mistakes made by his fellows and he will dare to correct them in their faces. However, that’s not always the case.
To sum up, as mentioned above, I firmly disagree with the statement which asserts that critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'player'?
Suggestion: player
...niques instead of hiring a professional players as a coach. Apparently, amateur tennis ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11825192802 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79090727793 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532133676093 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0255843005 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.117647059 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300460495262 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973224605681 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136910126384 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221826327513 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176294704637 0.0667264976115 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.