Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
Students are the building block of the nation and educational institutions like schools, colleges are the building block of these students. Educational institutions play a major role in the development of nation's student in a proper way. These educational institutions keep appropriate subjects through which students learn basic skills that help them in their daily life. It is correct that educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed but at the same time each student has his/her special interest in the study of a particular subject. These institutes can't force students to follow specific subjects. Let me bolster each of my points by giving some examples.
Educational institutions know students well. They have all data of each student. They know the capabilities of each student. So these educational institutions can guide their students in a proper way which will lead them to get good jobs. These educational institutions know the current job market, current technologies. These educational institutions have all view about companies and skills needed to get into these companies. So these educational institutions can better guide their students to get jobs in these companies.
This is true that these educational institutions can help students to get jobs and settle in their life but they cannot force each student to study proper subject. Because each student has different skill sets. Consider a hypothetical example, if one student is not good at history but good at science, then he should study the science. But because of subjects imposed by institute he needs to study history as well to clear his exams. So this will might lessen his interest in science and eventually, he will end up with no job. Also, each student has their own definition of success, some might call getting a good job as a success, some might call getting a failure in life as success, some might call getting into research as a success. So these educational institutions never the actual potential of the student.
So in summary, I just want to say that these educational institutions can dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed but don't force students to have particular subjects. Because every student has his/her own capabilities and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e in the development of nations student in a proper way. These educational institutions keep ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 647, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... a particular subject. These institutes cant force students to follow specific subje...
^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l institutions can guide their students in a proper way which will lead them to get good jobs. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e each student to study proper subject. Because each student has different skill sets. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... which they are unlikely to succeed but dont force students to have particular subje...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21354166667 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88911371905 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427083333333 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0594594054 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.86363636364 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444521970523 0.243740707755 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156744886207 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160838159705 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350348659738 0.150359130593 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15491555204 0.0667264976115 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.