Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

Essay topics:

Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

Giving educational institutions responsibility to advise students sounds a good idea to me. Though there can be problems in proper implimetation of it but institute can be a good guide to students.
Every year many students join programs and courses which they end disliking. Many students then choose different carrier path than their major in education. Students sometimes choose area which they may not fully aware of, They simply choose it because job prospects in that area are high or their parents force them to such areas. These students end up not performing well or even worse dropping out of colleges. such instances waste their money and other resources. They could have succeseded in other areas if proper guidance to them would have given to them.
Institute are actually are in good postion to tell whether a student will succeed in particular area or not. They have records of past students of similar profile and interest. This suggestions can not always be true but they can still serve to give students a different view when deciding their area of study. Actually many university websites and other resource give suggestions that students interested in this area may take this course. Proper counselling can guide students in deciding their area of study. Many a times students themselves can't decide what course is good for them and end up taking wrong courses.
On the other hand institute may not fully know the capabilities and weakness of students and give them wrong advise. A student can be really determined to go some field even though his past profile does not support it. Institute can also deliberatedly suggest students to pursue some course whose fee is high or some course whose enrollment is less irrespective of the profile of the student.But in that case it is always upto the student to decide the course. But institute may at least give them more information to work with.
In the end, the suggetion is viable and ccan be benificial to both students and society if properly implemented. Institute can advise students in deciding their area of study if they thoroughly study his/her profile. However, it should always be upto the student to decide.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...or even worse dropping out of colleges. such instances waste their money and other r...
^^^^
Line 2, column 538, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had given'?
Suggestion: had given
... other areas if proper guidance to them would have given to them. Institute are actually are i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...udents of similar profile and interest. This suggestions can not always be true but ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...study. Many a times students themselves cant decide what course is good for them an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. Many a times students themselves cant decide what course is good for them and ...
^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...espective of the profile of the student.But in that case it is always upto the stud...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, really, so, still, then, well, at least, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99726775956 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62529636701 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497267759563 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6127269909 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0952380952 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263018572245 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851560905935 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057411521346 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153363733662 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129003648231 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.