The author states that educational institutions have a responsibility to persuade the students from getting into a field of study in which they are unlikely to succeed and guide them to succeed. The teachers have the responsibility to encourage the students in which they are interested, not to discourage them. But, the given statement sounds against the responsibility of the teachers.
First, Being a teacher they should not be against of the student’s ambition or goal, instead they should support the students. Because, Nobody can decide that what will happen in the future, whether the student can succeed or not. For example, when we take The America's greatest inventor Thomas Alva Edison’s quotes, he said that “I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work”. Similarly, the teachers should provide their strongest support to the students, and encourage them instead of discourage.
Second, the teachers should encourage the student instead of persuading the them, when they student gets fail. Moreover, the students spending lot of time in school than with their parents. So, the teachers have several ways to make the student life more better than anyone. The teachers can tell the student’s fault, guide and teach them how to succeed in their own area of interest.
Everyone’s creativity and imagination differ from others. So, allow the students to do what they are liking, instead of forcing them that you don’t know about this and you may get fail, these are all cause disturbing the student.
Finally, I conclude that without having a depth analysis of the author’s statement will lead to a severe problem to the education institutions that they may get bad opinion from the students and parents. So, as a teacher or professor they should encourage their students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ct path of success and achievement. But i disagree with the argument that educati...
^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...otivated in the crucial years of college , they may grow to develop low self estee...
^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...derstanding ones own potential. In India , for example, due to the high poverty ra...
^^
Line 7, column 603, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ineering and MBBS without much interest so as to be placed good and help to support thei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...m it and making it right the next time. Thus till the time a student is not given an...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ble t achieve success and happiness. Thus educational institutes should not dissu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2971.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87848932677 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79416561664 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449917898194 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 930.6 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4132719197 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.791666667 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29166666667 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354073501752 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119351911419 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17126098455 0.0758088955206 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232901052865 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206674811785 0.0667264976115 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.