The author states that to understand the characteristics of the society, its enough to concentrate only on major cities. Here, the author should not make such assumption because the wealthy of the society is not only based major cities. If we need an exact information about a particular society or country that the measure should be equitable. Following paragraphs going to present a lot of example to support against the given statement.
First, The city and village can vary in some important aspects such as Education, Hospital, Business etc. When we see depth into that the quality of the above mentioned aspects may get differ. For example, the india the different types of education system like HSSC, CBSE which can vary in the quality of academic syllabus, teachers,teaching process, academic fees structure. If someone is poor then he or she has a less opportunity to studying in the higher quality school. In the city everyone has an opportunity to get into a good school.
Second, the hospital facility and technology also may get differ in both city and village. Since, the number of hospitals in the city is higher than the village, the people can go to the hospital immediately during an emergency situations, whereas the village has only one rural hospital that also not have enough facility to attend the patient. So, automatically the people will move on to the city to get a better treatments. Likewise, to get job people will go the city, because of the lack of job opportunities in the village.
Finally, I conclude that if we take the author’s statement under a consideration, it is not possible to get an exact characteristics of the society since the judgement is not fair. So, we need to consider the different cities and villages in many aspects to make a better understanding of characteristics of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teaching
...e quality of academic syllabus, teachers,teaching process, academic fees structure. If so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...ospital immediately during an emergency situations, whereas the village has only one rural...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'characteristic'?
Suggestion: characteristic
...ion, it is not possible to get an exact characteristics of the society since the judgement is n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, likewise, may, second, so, then, whereas, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97741935484 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99762132545 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51935483871 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1273311124 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935530614083 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332073755581 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454588378638 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617127925035 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381411657677 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.