Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement affirms that educational institutions are responsible to dissuade their students from working in areas that they might not hace success. Althought this could be true, this activity might destroy someones carrer or dreams.
The college and university is the place that people will be the first encounter with their field of studies and in contrast with the statement, the educational institutions have to estimulate students to find new fields of study. That’s to vage to a professor or a tutor to know what will be a field of success to a student and even more to see whats fields they are unlikely to succeed. New pupils need to be stimulated to work with the biggest domains possible in their studies and just after a long time with bad and good expericences, only the student can make the choise to what might be their field of study.
Moreover, it’s not difficult to find exemples which a person enters in a enginnering school and after some time leaves to course medicine. It’s very important that students could interact with other fields of study even different for their domain. The college is time when the person could see if that choise that he made is the correct and he can porsued for the rest of his life. Even before the course begin, the interaction with students from diferent fields could awake an hidden interest for that area and this student need to free to change and try to learn new experiences and skills.
Futhermore, students enter in educational institutions, very young. Indeed, they could be imature to make a choise of what they will be for their entire life. Parents or friends always force this young students to enter in a field of study that they think is likely to succeed, but in reallity it’s very possible that the contrary happen. In that case the institutions have the responsibility to stimulate that type of students to pursuid new fields of study, showing that the area with the biggest salary expectation are not necessary most likely to suceed.
In conclusion, what the statement says is when a student finds a field of study that he likes, he should be attached forever with that area and never look for new domains. This behaviour could be highly dangerous for the student personal and professional life. Everyone need to be free to chose what they like and no one have the ability to trace what is likely and unlikely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ccess to a student and even more to see whats fields they are unlikely to succeed. Ne...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... find exemples which a person enters in a enginnering school and after some time ...
^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...udents from diferent fields could awake an hidden interest for that area and this ...
^^
Line 4, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re not necessary most likely to suceed. In conclusion, what the statement says i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, so, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81400966184 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57146563839 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446859903382 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3169054298 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5625 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214953580501 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809140589429 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555827556069 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130041665474 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356531956405 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.