Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.

Educational institutions play an important role for all students building up a successful career. Many of us will say that all subjects studies seem unnecessary rather important to focus the main study plan which helps into career life. Familiar with this perception, students should be appreciated by their teachers to cut up unnecessary subjects. But, it is going too far to say that only pursing student's favorite subject brings success their life.

At early age of study, children minds are not enough mature to decide their own career. While at higher level, students can choose their own field where they want to build up their future. Most of the countries follow the same techniques that at a certain level students take general education for their moral development as well their base for knowledge. It is unnecessary to discourage students from all fields at their beginning stage. As a human being some common things should be known by everyone like own nation's history, cultural norms and regulations, familiar with some political issues, historical place, science and technology etc. For instance, someone wants to build up their future as a farmer thus he/she was dissuaded from pursuing all others fields. As a result he is unfamiliar with the mechanism of chemical pesticides and for this he may make mistake deciding its use when he need.

Moreover, success is not depending only educational background but also many more qualities. For example, a corporate officer must have not only a good knowledge about his work but also a good communication skill who can deal problems smartly. Additionally, leadership quality, good speaking ability, time management capability will be added value in his career life. Only good educational performance never expects good career or well performances. Likely, being a teacher, one should have not only good academic result but also more qualification needed including the capability of capturing students’ attention; make a monotonous lecture interesting to student. Like these, many more examples can be found in the world.

Everything links up with another platform in the universe. Only focus on one branch for successful career should be appreciated but at a certain level combined education helps students for their moral development as well their basic of knowledge. When students have basic knowledge of all branches, they get advantages to prefer their own choice. Without knowing basic issues, how will they find what fields more attracted to them? It is not necessary to mandate restricting students assembling their knowledge of all branches.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...same techniques that at a certain level students take general education for their moral ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...gs should be known by everyone like own nations history, cultural norms and regulations...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...use when he need. Moreover, success is not depending only educational background but also ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32530120482 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80864435075 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563855421687 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2375955555 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8636363636 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179698890728 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549110859982 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454885831689 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109298731273 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249026428126 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.