Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s

The station manager of KICK recently suggests that more call-in advice program can gain more attention of listeners according to follow WCQP radio station's strategy. Based on WCQP's result and nationwide survey report they recommends this program. Therefore at first glance, author claim seems logical though a careful scrutiny can reveal its logical flaws and ill-terminology.

At first, KICK manager concludes his result based on WCQP radio station which published two year ago. This long time may effect on public demand and WCQP managers may change their program based on present scenario. It should be more fruitfull decission if KICK author compare them with WCQP's present scenario. It may happen that by reducing Call-in advice program they might increase other recent demanded program like talk-show with celebrity, music program, weather news or others. Based on present demad, managers should modify their progam according to demand.

Secondly, WCQP and KICK, thses two radio stations are situated two different places. Geographic situation might influence on taste nature. Only following other strategy never come up with a good output. Culture, weather, nature, ethics and customs always vary from place to place. Perhaps in Rockville people prefer call-in advice program for medical suggestion which very helpful for them. Doctor's visit may high in this area, that's why they get any kind of advice cheaply in this way. Perhaps it is not necessary for Medway people. They have ability to pay doctor's fee. For this particular reason, People in Rockville may be like this program very much. Call-in advice program may be held in various issues. Some are like beauty tips program, some are cooking related, health advice, aethletic purpose, celebrity live talk shows and many others. For particular which call-in advice progrm gets popularity in this Rockville region and for what reasons hide back inside must reveal first to imitate them.

To capture listeners attention, WCQP radio station's might follow some other steps which somehow neglected by KICK manager. May be not only call-in advice program but also other facilities may help WCQP gathering more customers like good radio frequency and signals, cheap subscriptions cost, sequential and benefical program considering all ages people etc. KICK manager must evaluate all angles before terminating that only call-in advice program helps WCQP radio station.

Lastly, author implies here nationwide survey indicate that listeners are quite interest in such programs but author actually make decission for a particular region. Whole country's result seems mis-match sometimes any particular areas. Similarly survey date, sample size and survey reasons are not clear here. Probably, this survey hold on extrapolating for television shows not for radio station. Also, this survey might be conducted five years ago because this type of vast survey never held in every year. Nation's wide survey may held in prticular time interval. So, it is very tricky to trace survey result might useful for now or not. Another way, nation's wide result may compare with another nation's report not perfect for a small region. It should be consider by KICK manager when take decission.

Last of all, many controversial opinions may arise with author opinion. To make it clear and bolster author's side, all aforementioned information must be given first otherwise it seems void to accept this decission.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'recommend'
Suggestion: recommend
...esult and nationwide survey report they recommends this program. Therefore at first glance...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ey report they recommends this program. Therefore at first glance, author claim seems log...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...lished two year ago. This long time may effect on public demand and WCQP managers may ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...m. Doctors visit may high in this area, thats why they get any kind of advice cheaply...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...s-match sometimes any particular areas. Similarly survey date, sample size and survey rea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 760, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
...erfect for a small region. It should be consider by KICK manager when take decission. ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2921.0 2260.96107784 129% => OK
No of words: 540.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40925925926 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38521034608 2.78398813304 86% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 204.123752495 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 891.0 705.55239521 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 19.7664670659 172% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6047355914 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9117647059 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 23.324526521 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.70786347227 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.67664670659 278% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243694096206 0.218282227539 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595600257037 0.0743258471296 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708441674339 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133534056898 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743023890124 0.0628817314937 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.3550499002 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 98.500998004 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 33 15
No. of Words: 540 350
No. of Characters: 2853 1500
No. of Different Words: 282 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.821 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.283 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.351 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 237 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 156 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 92 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.326 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.576 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.264 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.454 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5