There has been a long standing debate regarding whether the educational institutions should or should not interfere in the selection choice of the field of study for students. The supporters of the argument believe that the students are the best judge of their abilities and they should be allowed to select their are of interest in education. They also propagate the importance of free will as their argument. However, I believe that Educational institutions should interject and persuade students to avoid selecting the field of study in which they are not likely perform according to their abilities.
Educational institutions are hub of learned academics who have spent large part of their lives working with the students from diverse backgrounds. By virtue of their experience these educational specialists can easily find out the strengths and weaknesses of the students. They can project with great amount of accuracy that whether a particular student is going to excel in engineering, social sciences, arts or history. On the other hand the young students are naive and inexperienced, they have merely studied few elementary courses of a particular field. So their decision would be based on that limited knowledge which is invariably significantly less as compare to the esteemed academics. Therefore, a lifetime failure can be easily avoided if the decision for area of study could be taken in consultation with professionals of educational institutions.
The students usually select field of study that based on the level of their comfort in a particular subject. This basically means that the more easily they find a particular subject the more inclined they are for selecting it for their future. However, success may not be directly linked to the comfort level that one has in a particular field. It could depend on of other factors such as the scope of that field in the outside world and the quality of educational facilities for that particular field. While selecting a particular field a student might not consider such important factors, however the professionals at academic institutions would certainly consider such factors owing to their experience and nature of job.
It can be concluded here that educational institutions have a great responsibility in guiding the students for their area of study since students have limited knowledge for making this important decision. The careers of lots of students could be saved by interjecting at the right time instead of seeing them heading towards a certain failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...es and they should be allowed to select their are of interest in education. They also...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... which is invariably significantly less as compare to the esteemed academics. Ther...
^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fessionals of educational institutions. The students usually select field of stu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them heading towards a certain failure.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28395061728 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94258009668 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471604938272 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2574508932 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.882352941 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202498267093 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730860338582 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501975919446 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133630309405 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325053013665 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.