Art plays an important role in projecting the clean and peaceful of a nation. A society where art and culture is thriving is considered to superior to its contemporaries. History regards art loving societies in much better manner than societies that are not so much inclined towards arts. We can take the examples of societies like Greeks, Romans, Mesopotamians and many more which are still known for the love of arts and culture. However, an industry like art is not known for its economic viability. The people who can appreciate a true artistic work are rare and people who can actually financially support the artists are even more rare to find. Therefore, it becomes the responsibility to lend its financial support to art industry to keep it on its feet.
It has been widely believed that artists do not require money to produce great artistic work. While this argument is valid to a certain extent, however an artist no matter how much dedicated requires financial support to afford the daily cost of living. An artist having poor economic conditions would spend a lot of time for thinking ways to make ends meet and therefore would not spend enough time to produce quality art work.
Artists are not the only factor that requires financial aid to support their art, the quality art work might require extra ordinary financial effects in terms of material and infrastructure support. One can take the example of Norte Dame cathedral, which could not have been possible without the support of the emperor Constantine. Similarly, there are other examples like Eiffel tower in Paris , Taj Mahal in Agra, Pyramids of Egypt and many more. These art work could never have been available to us for appreciating them if the governments of that time have not supported these mega projects. Medicis' the rulers of Florence were known to be of great supporters of art and their support to Leonardo Da Vinci led to the great art work which is still an inspiration for the young artists of today.
It has been propagated that if government supports art it will eventually debase the artists and instead of producing art they would start using it for spreading the government propaganda. While this could be true for governments with autocratic rulers in which there is one or very few center of authorities and no proper system exists to distribute the funds fairly. In democratic countries where everything is institutionalized, the system for fairly distributing the funds can also be introduced which can easily overcome the stated apprehension.
The art and culture are actually the mirror of a society and one can easily take the pulse of any society by observing its progress in these fields. Therefore, it is very important for the government to support this industry and introduce fair system which can ensure the quality art work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... to its contemporaries. History regards art loving societies in much better manner than so...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ther examples like Eiffel tower in Paris , Taj Mahal in Agra, Pyramids of Egypt an...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun center seems to be countable; consider using: 'few centers'.
Suggestion: few centers
...ic rulers in which there is one or very few center of authorities and no proper system exi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which can ensure the quality art work.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2372.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97274633124 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71404956106 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488469601677 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5402387123 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.85 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276983368537 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907743109364 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475438345813 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165135457505 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629417208813 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.