The issue posits a question "Who is superior! Creator or Created?". This debate has been recently intensified mainly owing to the progress made by science in developing so called 'autonomous machines'. While some people argue that a thing that has been developed by someone cannot out smart the creator, the people on the other side of the fence straight away points to the computer beating the human chess world champion. While their example is very relevant and compelling, however to designate something superior to another demands superiority in all aspects. Do really the machines are superior in every aspect?
Research has revealed that humans have so far been successful in using only a fraction of its brain. This basically means that there is a lot more about the human mind that is still unexplored and unknown. Even the current generation machines have limited intelligence and only functions accurately in a well defined environment. For example the autonomous air crafts known as unmanned aerial vehicles could only land and take off if the environmental conditions for which they are designed exists. In case of any deviation from ideal situation the results are usually catastrophic. Similarly, robots can only distinguish among objects that have been taught to them by humans and fail once an unknown object pops out. Therefore, machines have so far only limited capabilities and cannot be regarded as superior to humans.
Although, the earlier machines were dumb and had limited capabilities, the modern machines have been augmented with Artificial intelligence. This latest innovation of artificial intelligence have turned these ordinary unintelligent machines into the so called 'smart machines'. The concept behind Artificial intelligence is that the machines instead of relying on the preassigned decision making algorithms could actually come up with the solutions based on the prevailing situation through learning just as human beings do. Scientists are so far trying to inculcate and emulate the thought process of a human mind in these machines with a limited degree of success. There is no doubt that this is an astounding achievement in itself, however we are still far from developing machines that can actually think in a manner that could be attributed superior or even closer to human cognition.
Going through the arguments and evidence, it could be concluded that despite an enormous development we have achieved so far, we are still partially successful in achieving the goal of an actual 'smart machine'. Moreover, only human beings have used only fraction of their brains till date which is still far superior to the machines of today. However, the topic stretches the timeline to eternity by using the word "always". Therefore, we may never know for sure that whether the machines would eventually surpass human intellect or not but what we do know for sure is that currently the human mind is far more capable even with the fraction of its usage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'demands'' or 'demand's'?
Suggestion: demands'; demand's
...designate something superior to another demands superiority in all aspects. Do really t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, moreover, really, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2530.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25987525988 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85128749503 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530145530146 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4919834204 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.476190476 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9047619048 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23455620263 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746346457177 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051143125471 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149359048953 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404943054061 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.