Should one's career path be dictated by others? While some people needs help in choosing a field of study, others already know and have developed an interest in a particular field of study and as such are likely to fail if such interest in changed by an educational institution. In my view, educational institutions should not dictate to students what field of study they should pursue, this is because it can result in the likelihood of not succeeding in such fields as compared to one's field of interest.
Dissuading a student from pursuing his interest in a field of study disposes such to failure in the long run. In a case where by a student is prevented from having a career in a particular field which interests him, he ends up not showing up and paying the due diligence needed to succeed. For example, in one of the higher institutions in Nigeria, students are to take an entrance examination to determine if they have the capacity to succeed in their chosen field of interest. Students who fail to score up to the cut off mark of their program of interest ended up being admitted to programs which most times are not related to their chosen program. It has been reported that, a number of such Students ended up taking the admission and failing at it because it was "assigned" to them and not of their interest. In a situation like this, students career or long term goals are ruined and as such the proposed policy should not be implemented.
Another result of implementing such a policy is having more people pursuing fields of study in a particular category and few in others. Due to a widely accepted claim that fields of study in the science category are more difficult than other fields in the arts and commercial, a number of students who feel incapable ended up studying in those fields other than sciences.
However, some students end up having a greater interest in the fields they are advised to pursue and succeed greatly at it. Despite that, there is a greater possibility that such students might have succeeded more in their field of interest than in the one they are advised to pursue. So, why not allow students pursue their interest?
In conclusion, educational institutions should not in any way dissuade students from pursuing fields of study they perceive they are unlikely to succeed. Instead they should allow them pursue their field of interests to prevent producing failures or incompetent individuals in different fields of study. We all have things that interest us and we succeed greatly doing them. As such, educational pursuit should not be an exception.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ucceeding in such fields as compared to ones field of interest. Dissuading a stud...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereby'?
Suggestion: whereby
...h to failure in the long run. In a case where by a student is prevented from having a ca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...the capacity to succeed in their chosen field of interest. Students who fail to score...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...t times are not related to their chosen program. It has been reported that, a number of...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... perceive they are unlikely to succeed. Instead they should allow them pursue their fie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84375 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74297572288 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435267857143 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3992220479 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261944704527 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107906592 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076986738985 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17081130444 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473278740547 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.