Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
Education plays a massive role in polishing the most valuable asset of the society- its future generation- who possess all the power to either make the nation loud and proud or let it go down the road of darkness. In such a scenario, the aforementioned claim that education providers should find out about the interests of the students and then incorporate those valuable findings into the educational curriculum, conspicuously manages to hold ground.
To begin with, interest is what motivates a person to work diligently and serves as the driving force to the final outcome. If the courses and subject matter being taught isn’t successful in grabbing the positive attention of the students, we can’t expect the students to display commendable results. On the other hand, going with the claim will provide a sense to the students that their educators acknowledge their interests and are keen to help them get to the highest peaks of success. Moreover, students will eventually pay more heed to what is being taught and put in all their efforts to gain a positive outcome.
Additionally, if we could tweak the premise a little and supplant “what” with “how”, it would again be very beneficial in regard to boosting up the motivation of the students. When the phenomenon of parabola is being provided in a plain white walled classroom, with the educator writing all the concepts on the whiteboard, it seemingly won’t interest those who are studying. However, when the same concepts are taught through its practical application while the students play throwball, they surely will peruse the minds of the students more and will be retained for a longer time as well.
It can be rightly argued that in some circumstances, embracing the claim with open hands might deem detrimental instead of beneficial. This would be true in the case of school curriculum because that is when the students are not mature enough to decide for themselves what would be beneficial for them in the long run. They might regard mathematics as boring and not useful when in reality, at the very least the basic concepts of math turn out to be fundamental for everyone regardless of their occupations.
In conclusion, the claim provided above does highlight a major teaching strategy which when incorporated efficiently during college and above levels of study, will surely benefit the education system and the society at whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the educator writing all the concepts on the whiteboard, it seemingly won&apos...
^^
Line 17, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cation system and the society at whole.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1783919598 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89824746837 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.064437724 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 158.538461538 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153161832009 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056343728955 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380059622808 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833346668813 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243200701603 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.