Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education plays a major part in the economic development of a nation. Thus, it is important to educate children; however, everyone have their own interest of study, so the author contends that it is important to take students interest into consideration while organising a curriculum. In my opinion, I partially disagree with the statement for three reasons.
To begin with, it is crucial to take into consideration interests of students, since it will build a foundation in the field they are interested in and provide a bright future. For example, if a student is interested in the field of physics, educators must provide subjects related to physics. This technique will also avoid the waste of time involved by the students to get involved in other subjects such as economics, history etc. As it only focuses on physics, it creates a strong base for students to become a scientists at an early age. Thus, from the above example, it is clear that, interest based curriculum will provide a vast knowledge in the field he or she is interested, and it also improves their opportunities to get specific jobs.
However, Educators are called ‘educators’ for a reason. They are experienced in planning curriculums which benefit students. Hence, students should believe their educators in formulating their study plans. For instance, technology is ever changing and so are job markets as well as education. In the field of technology, robotics is a subject which involves building robots for human commercial purposes. Curriculum planners know the trends of the world, so they would plan to add robotics into the curriculum. However not destroying the basic curriculum which involves basic math, science and social science. There is no robotics without math and physics, thus every subject is dependent on the other. From the above example, it is clear that educators tend to add subjects that are much needed for the students in the future while also not rejecting the foundation which are the basics for the study. Hence, there is no reason to not believe in educators, since experience comes first, and students might not be experienced and well informed to make their interest as the best decision for the future.
Also, every student might have different interests like music, physics, biology, chemistry, painting and many more. Thus, it requires a lot of man power and time to formulate such course structures. For example, if a student is interested in music, educators must be in a position of eliminating subjects like economics, social science, physics and math. It is possible to eliminate irrelevant fields and add subjects like sound, waves, chords, instruments etc. However, if we look closely into the fields required for music study, it involves basics in physics and math. Picking what is needed and formulating the syllabus again is a laborious task. Thus, from the above example, it can be seen that students cannot survive in the industry without their basics of study and it requires years of preparation to formulate a syllabus for each subjects.
In conclusion, educators knows best and we have to believe their opinions about the education systems. However, students who are interested in a subject, they can join workshops or study as elective courses while not affecting their basic curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 514, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scientist' or simply 'scientists'?
Suggestion: a scientist; scientists
...es a strong base for students to become a scientists at an early age. Thus, from the above e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'vast knowledge'.
Suggestion: vast knowledge
... interest based curriculum will provide a vast knowledge in the field he or she is interested, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...an to add robotics into the curriculum. However not destroying the basic curriculum whi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2788.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14391143911 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80655689737 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459409594096 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0348205952 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.259259259 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0740740741 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155139566185 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507542111557 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358094747973 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935421603697 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428413700837 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.