Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
I don't agree with the recommendation. I think that teachers should teach the facts first and then explain the concepts and reasons behind the observations.
First, teaching the facts can make students curious about the reasons behind them. Therefore, students can be motivated and desire to learn. It is crucial for educators to offer motivations for students because if they are willing to know the truth behind the facts, they might not be limited to what teachers taught in classes but search for more information on their own. For example, when kids observe that there are clouds in the sky, they start to ask a lot of questions about why they are formed.
Second, ideas and concepts are sometimes hard to understand because they are too abstract. By offering the facts first, students can always think of an example when they try to realize the theories. For example, many teachers in Taiwan take students to see the rainbow first and then explain the reasons behind it. Thus, when they teach that people would see different colors at different angles, students can easily understand because they have already observed the fact.
Also, most theories come from some facts that were inexplicable so teachers that teach the truths and then try to explain them can make students understand the actual research process. For example, most teachers in Taiwan pay too much attention on teaching the theories and fail to offer some reasons why scientists would like to develop such new concepts. As a result, many Taiwanese students think that they should stay in the lab and wait until they suddenly come up with some interesting ideas when they try to do some researches. However, most of the scientific breakthroughs come into being to explain to observations that don't fit in current theories rather than just pop up in scientists' heads.
To conclude, I think that the facts are more concrete and important to motivated students to think of why we observe them. Therefore, teachers should offer the facts first and then explain the ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont agree with the recommendation. I think ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of questions about why they are formed. Second, ideas and concepts are sometimes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 630, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o being to explain to observations that dont fit in current theories rather than jus...
^^^^
Line 7, column 704, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than just pop up in scientists heads. To conclude, I think that the facts are ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99707602339 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50272072465 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5373856046 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227419598621 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900131299859 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679715024129 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159577229601 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418990312808 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.