The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
The author infers that the well-being of the country's citizens can successfully imply the effectiveness of the country's leader. Country's leader is for the citizens and therefore well-being of the country's citizens are important indicator of leader's performance. However, evaluating leader is much more complicated job than just measuring citizen's happiness. I disagree with the statement in that every country has its own specific environment and policies should sometimes viewed with long-term perspective.
Some people argue that the most important role of country's leader is to make its citizens happy and make them feel comfort because the leader is for the country's citizens. Many people also regarded country's with high welfare as great nations with great leaders. For example, United States where have the most developed welfare system and comforted citizens considered as the greatest country in the world. Likewise the leaders who are considered as great manager such as Lincoln, Roosevelt actually leads the well-being of the country's citizens.
However, evaluating the effectiveness only by considering the welfare of the country is too simple-minded. Actually assessing the leader's performance is more complicated because each country has its peculiarity and has their own problems. For example, let us consider country in Africa. Africa's leader could not lead his high well-being of citizens merely because its lack of funding. He may actually achieve greater performance than any so-called 'effective leader' if sufficient money was provided. It is unfair to treat the leader as ineffective and incompetent merely because the country's welfare is not highly developed. Likewise country where war is imminent, should spend most of their money for military not for citizen's wealth to save the nation. If we evaluate a leader only by achievement about well-being of citizens, he/she can be assessed as ineffective even if he/she had successfully managed the war.
What is more, there are policies which should be viewed with long-term sight. Some policies need times to make positive effects and therefore it is not logical to regard leader's achievement as incompetent or unsuccessful just because current state of well-being of citizens is not high enough. Leader who develops new renewable energy, for example, will bring huge success such as independence to oil, well preserved environment, etc and should not be regarded as ineffective just because the policies of developing new energy source do not make immediate positive effects. Likewise, leader who seeks only for short-term effects without regarding long-term can cause immediate positive effect but finally will bring disaster in future such as Japan's lost decade, Korea's IMF Crisis and he/she should not be regarded as great leader.
In conclusion, I admit that well-being of the country's citizens are important factor and primary role of country's leader. However assessing performance of leaders by examining the well-being of the country's people can miss specific conditions of nations and can lead regarding shortsighted manager as effective. Therefore I disagree with the argument based on above mentioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'view'
Suggestion: view
...vironment and policies should sometimes viewed with long-term perspective. Some peo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...d as the greatest country in the world. Likewise the leaders who are considered as great...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...o simple-minded. Actually assessing the leaders performance is more complicated because...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g of citizens merely because its lack of funding. He may actually achieve greater...
^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...untrys welfare is not highly developed. Likewise country where war is imminent, should s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...or and primary role of countrys leader. However assessing performance of leaders by exa...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ding shortsighted manager as effective. Therefore I disagree with the argument based on a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2713.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54805725971 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85438527089 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456032719836 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7347962507 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.956521739 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2608695652 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04347826087 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508935392653 0.243740707755 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181102812674 0.0831039109588 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137695695924 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349640464337 0.150359130593 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12051979165 0.0667264976115 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.