Environmental protection policies should not be applicable to corporations, which generate significant financial and economic growth, even if such growth may have a negative impact on the environment.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Before the age of the Internet, the environment fulfilled the most basic needs of all living beings. Any nation uses its environmental resources to further its progress and also to provide for basic needs of its inhabitants like food, water and shelter. Environmental exploitation, if left unchecked can have disastrous consequences which can potentially lead to global extinction. I personally believe that environmental protection policies are paramount to the health and safety of the inhabitants of a nation as well as to the economic growth of the nation.
The environment is the most important asset any country can have. It provides humans with oxygen, food, water and various other resources. These are basic necessities of mankind, without which mankind cannot survive. During medieval times, the attacking armies, while sieging a city or a fort, usually blocked the defenders' access to drinking water and food. This means that even if the siege is not going as well as expected, due to food and water shortage, the defending armies would have to cede their city.
Since the Industrial Revolution, humans have been exploiting the environment at a rapid pace. The birth of machines gave rise to pollution. The birth of machines also increased the pace with which we were mining resources. As the existing mines dried up, the search for new ones begun. Wars were being fought for access to these new resources leading to undue loss of human life.
Because of this exploitation, we are facing numerous challenges right now. Global Warming is increasing the temperature of the Earth. Scientists theorize that if Global Warming is not halted, the effects could be irreversible in the next 50 years. Improper handling of toxic wastes has led to poisoning of various areas across the globe. Rampant pollution is leading to bad air quality and increase in respiratory problems. The pollution is also leading to the loss of the ozone layer which protects us from harmful radiation from space and the loss is leading to higher rate of cancer.
The consequences if environmental protection policies are not made applicable to everyone are catastrophic. Because of the rising temperature, coastal cities could submerge under water because of melting of glaciers. The complete loss of ozone layer will lead to extinction. But in some rare cases, depending on whether a corporation is making compensations to the environmental damage it caused, it can be given some leeway on these policies. The compensation must not be monetary, but it must be towards the environment.
In conclusion it can be said that no matter the economic growth, a clean environment is of more importance and collaborative efforts should be taken to curb the harmful effects of neglecting the environment. The implementation of environmental protection policies should be applicable evenly everywhere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... and various other resources. These are basic necessities of mankind, without which mankind canno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2429.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26898047722 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99033440263 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53579175705 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2110230702 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.962962963 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0740740741 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.37037037037 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223129064073 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537605553713 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673468537021 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116910664874 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796734091299 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.