Essay topic 10: Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education is a powerful mean which makes economical and social changes in the world. Therefore, a proper education system should be implemented. As affording tuition fees of universities has always been one of the challenges of students and their supporters, some people believe that government should consider the policy of tuition waver for the students who are admitted to universities but are unable to pay the tuition. I generally concur with this policy which rises a heated debate on both its merits and demerits.
The first benefit of this policy is providing an equal condition for all students including low income students. Many students depend on their parents for financial supports. Low income families encounter monetary problems to have their children participate in universities; therefore, students have to either leave their studies or burden immense debut for years after graduation. This policy also deprives poor talented students of pursuing higher education. Free education will help such students to continue their education which not only increases education level and knowledge of the society but also provides the low income graduate students with opportunities to find a better job positions changing their life for better in the future. For instance, Germany provides free academic education to all students; thus, students of lower socioeconomic states will have a better chance in achieving their educational goals.
Furthermore, allowing underprivileged students to access academic education eliminates the mono culture universities. Free education helps students from diverse cultures and countries attend the universities to create an environment replete with new ideas and perspectives and it avoids students experiencing marginalization of minorities and lower socioeconomic. As a result, they would be exposed to the real world by juxtaposing various classes of society with various lifestyles.
In contrast, some argue that free education may financially put extra burden on government to make the balance of budget and tax to maintain the universities and relevant affiliates as well as services such as students’ insurance, food and accommodation. Thus, tuition fee could cover such expenses. Besides, students from low income families can be financially supported by universities’ funds and scholarships if they can meet the universities’ requirements like high rank universities in the USA which have created a competitive scholarly environment in which majority of assiduous and talented students try hard to gain financial aids.
In conclusions, the government should provide free university education so that students from low income families can participate in colleges. Nevertheless, affording all the university expenses’ puts a high financial pressure on the government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2445.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8353221957 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24717787266 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54892601432 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.1722047432 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.21951772744 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277284378448 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899804555678 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711810581596 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174146104695 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739178534538 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.1639044944 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.