Essay topic 13: Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions play a significant role in inspiring students to choose practical majors which bring students remunerative outcomes. Such a perspective raises a controversial issue. Some argue that educational centers should encourage students to choose their field of study while others believe that students should select their career path in accordance with their interests and abilities. Considering the importance of ability and interest in being successful in a major and a career, I would discuss that educational centers should provide eclectic resources and give students freedom in choosing their own career in consistent with their personal interests and talents.
First of all, students attend educational centers to learn and get trained in their chosen field. Studying in college is the last period of learning for many students and they would begin working in society and live on their own. As a result, they need to equip themselves with sufficient knowledge and skills in the college years to ensure they are qualified enough in the competitive market. Students majored in the field with abundant job opportunities and high salaries like IT, programming and medical science tend to generally gain a high probability than those majored in history and geography. Thus, the positive effect of encouraging students to select fields with a lucrative prospect by educational institutions is undeniable.
However, advancement of technology in recent years has proved that specific fields demand the greater talents which lead to higher wages. Almost two decades ago, electronic engineering graduates could get jobs with satisfactory salaries by inventing integrated circuits while in the recent years IT and programming graduate students are valued by the largest companies like Google and Microsoft. It cannot be guaranteed what technology prevails now would continue to flourish after twenty years. Therefore, there might be risks if educational institutions recommend all students to study specific fields.
Furthermore, discrepancies exist among students and their talents as well as interest which demonstrate all students learning similar courses might not obtain positive results. For instance, a student who is interested in history will find it tough follow institution recommendation to study computer science. A student gifted in math may find Literature courses rather dull. Consequently, students studying beyond their interests or talents may lose their enthusiasm for learning and their precious time may be wasted which could be spent on their favorite subjects.
To conclude, students should be given opportunities to choose their field of study and educational centers nee to provide sufficient resources in various fields to meet the demands students. Hence, students could be supplied by adequate resources to utilize their talents and interests which eventually end up with satisfactory career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...o learn and get trained in their chosen field. Studying in college is the last period...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73120728929 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93361180402 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542141230068 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7258054147 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.421052632 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1052631579 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290711706887 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100102871685 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660863687183 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177367333494 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519458735993 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.