Essay topic 2: Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The main learning period of knowledge, ideas, beliefs, skills and values occurs in education institutions which play a huge role in developing and shaping students into professionals and responsible citizens. It is the responsibility of educational institutions to recognize students’ strengths and weakness and encourage them to take the appropriate paths. Therefore, educational centers should discourage students from pursuing fields of interest in which they may encounter difficulties hindering them to be successful.
To begin with, educational institutions can realize the inclination of the students and nurture their talents accordingly. They are effective in evaluating students’ skills through the grade point average, teacher comments and some quizzes and collect the same chances of success in any structure. These centers have the duty to identify individual’s talents and foster them to become consummate professionals.
In addition, the possibility of reaching the zenith for students is considerably increased by nurturing their talents from the beginning. The students can begin their professional careers much more quickly and contribute to society by turning into a valuable asset. As the student has a very biased training dedicated to his interests, opportunities come knocking on his door. Doubt on this argument can be cast be the fact of existence of students who are unsure of their strengths and career paths. However, the doubt is overshadowed by the fact that this issue can be easily solved by career counseling and wise guidance.
Moreover, studying any fields in college requires investments in time, energy and money. Students have to devote time to complete their credits and end up spending on high tuition fees. Therefore, pursuing a major in consistent with one’s abilities and potentials could facilitates such a path. Success also depends on hard work, persistent and dedication to get improved. The educational institutions may encourage them to try out available scholarships and assist them in finding an opportunity to work in consistent with their capabilities.
Some may argue that educational centers are supposed to be a place where everyone should get an equal chance to grow and help individuals fulfill their dream by pursuing the right path and direction to them. Thus, if institutions discourage the students, they not only impede students to achieve their dreams but they also demotivate them. However, there are some students either pursing unrealistic passions or being influenced by their surroundings to choose fields in which they have less chance to succeed.
In conclusion, educational institutions should prevent students following fields that may lead to failure and waste of time and money. Academic centers can advise students to select the appropriate paths to be successful professionals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'facilitate'
Suggestion: facilitate
...e's abilities and potentials could facilitates such a path. Success also depends on ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... with their capabilities. Some may argue that educational centers are supposed t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69585253456 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16335867632 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4217223282 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217605069771 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666885991223 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577423935499 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120908035121 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749370878421 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.