Essay topic 6: Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Those in power are typically experts in their fields and they have achieved their positions by knowledge, skills, abilities and experience. Some people argue that managers and principals should be changed after five years since the key to success is appointing new leaders. I agree with this assertion that we should set a time limit for those in power in so far as the new leaders are beneficial to their respective enterprise. However, we should bear in mind that experienced and qualified leaders have undeniable role in succeeding many of the biggest businesses and organizations.
First and foremost, new leaders are often very motivated, flexible and full of new ideas with less bias. They have not been restricted to the routine process of work and they commonly seek for the new ways of managing the relevant businesses. they are also familiar with the most recent technological and services around the world and such characteristics are viable for any enterprise whereas old leaders are comfortable with their status quo and often remain latent at the challenge ahead. As a result, the business would not be able to cope with the challenging world and gradually the business will lose its power.
Moreover, the leaders who remain in power for a long time maintain the absolute power which might get them corrupt. For instance, we can see leaders in my country with high level managerial positions that spend the national wealth and budget for their personal purposes rather than improve the economical problems of the country.
It is also argued that we must keep a good leader for a long time as it is believed “knowledge is power” which holds true in some fields. Most fields benefit from leaders in power who have deep knowledge of those area- scientists have spent decades researching the same topic, teachers who have specialized in one area of study, and CEOs who have spent their careers with the same company. Having wells of knowledge create leaders that can draw on their own stores and personal experiences to solve dynamic problems and forge strong entities such as businesses, governments, and universities. Admittedly, new leaders might not be as experienced and knowledgeable as the old ones and they possibly make wrong decisions. Furthermore, the new leaders may confront the sophistication of some tasks and they cannot manage them logically. They are also more likely to take risks which might be detrimental for the entities; though, taking the risk is a part of any business and the ability to take risks is substantive to approach accomplishments. Therefore, it is recommended that the optimum trend to revitalize an organization is better achieved in strategy than in leadership.
To conclude, enterprises should revitalize their entities with new qualified and innovative leaders every five years. However, experienced leaders, who are respected and appreciated, should be kept in their managerial position but not for a long time to use their valuable experience in various fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ys of managing the relevant businesses. they are also familiar with the most recent ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...rsonal purposes rather than improve the economical problems of the country. It is als...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...ers in power who have deep knowledge of those area- scientists have spent decades research...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21020408163 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88564789347 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522448979592 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1848296248 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.368421053 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7894736842 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166234715741 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573517201914 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386434364235 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104236338594 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253455790246 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.