Essay topic 3: Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting you

Essay topics:

Essay topic 3: Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

There have always been scandals in history. Speakers and reformers try to make the world better by shedding light on delicate and intricate issues that do not come into light due to lack of exposure and accessibility of the public or the government to notice them. On the one hand, being exposed to scandals in the past few years, people are fairly aware of the injustice, false claims and promises they have encountered. On the other hand, the revelation of scandals is considered useless unless they prevent the same problems from emerging. Therefore, I partly agree with this assertion.

Firstly, scandals could be useful as they reveal the society’s problems over time. When an issue is brought to light by a speaker or a reformer, they want to voice out their opinions so that a change should be made. Such an incident is happening in my country. Corruption and bribery are prevalent amongst the politicians in Iran. Some celebrities and journalists have constantly been disclosing their scandals via social medias to make significant changes to better.

Secondly, people have relied on politicians and advocated them in their elections before. Focusing on their scandals, speakers and reformers make people prudent of this issue and prevent them from electing the same people for the future elections.

However, it is argued that the impact of getting population’s attention to scandals is temporary. The scandals will be expunged once the media stop talking about them. People are triggered and outraged by the scandal issues but the media pose other new issues before the previous issues are tackled or sensibly studied.

In addition, concentrating on scandals can be worthy providing that some changes are made. For instance, the recent economical problems in Iran have been under investigation. It was revealed that thousands of Euros have been spent illegally by some top mangers . No firm action was taken against them which implies that such issues keep happening.

To conclude, it is obvious that many illegal and corruptible practices occur throughout the world and exposure of at least one of such will make people contemplate the latent problems of the society. Nevertheless, this disclosure of scandals will be useless if no fundamental chases take into consideration.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 117, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nges are made. For instance, the recent economical problems in Iran have been under invest...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, at least, for instance, in addition, talking about, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2884097035 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83462365901 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55525606469 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4415262476 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4285714286 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128144448938 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03926401055 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322422889188 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644870004618 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260405922067 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.