Essay topic 4: Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in whi

Essay topics:

Essay topic 4: Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.

Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Cultural traditions can be reckoned as a hallmark of a country and international face left in the memories of other countries’ people. The cultural traditions of a nation are primarily placed in countryside; therefore, government should ensure consistent financial aids for preservation and development of cultural traditions in rural areas. Major cities should be aided financially because of their governmental function rather than protecting a nation’s cultural traditions.

Firstly, cultural traditions are kept in the countryside rather than major cities. Economic progress has decolored indigenous traits of major cities. Consequently, culture traditions are replaced by cosmopolitan metropolises. Major cities like New York, Tokyo, and Tehran already have sufficient sources of income from businesses, factories, and highly developed infrastructures which can manage the city without external financial aids from the governments.

In the contrary, rural areas are still agrarian and depend on traditional sources of income such as farming and handicrafts which are considered as part of nation’s heritage. Therefore, government should preserve such cultural traditions by furnishing them financial aids including endorsement and publicity of their life styles and projecting tourism.

Besides, being neglected by the government, habitants of rural areas change their traditional business. Should the government provide financial help to traditional businesses of the residents of rural areas will preserve their traditional business. Otherwise, such national treasures will be expunged due to lack of funding and support.

It may also be argued that some old cities like London, Paris and Rome have historical building with magnificent traditional architecture, museums, emperor castles and cuisines but they constitute small portions in all traditional culture of a nation. The government may financially help major cities to maintain infrastructures such as museums, galleries, government offices and constructions like the White House and traditional churches.

In conclusion, a nation’s cultural traditions like lifestyle and handicrafts are originated in rural areas. Thus, it is incumbent that government should preserve the cultural heritage and traditions of a nation by financial support and assist major cities to improve their infrastructure needs.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o improve their infrastructure needs.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21791044776 5.05705443957 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29219494573 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528358208955 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6235954879 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.1875 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328766450613 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124115726827 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749694562232 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194720652965 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570891589093 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.1639044944 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.