Essay topics: In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this statement, the writer claims that individuals cannot cooperate efficiently without being strongly inspired by the past advancements in each specific area. In fact, I do not completely agree with the statement that it seems to be problematic in some aspects.
To begin with, obviously, we cannot generalize the writer's assumption to all fields. Sometimes groups are working on a newborn subject that the existence of its' previous documents is doubtable. It is highly possible that a person wants to cooperate with a team working on a rather novel field in which there were no significant achievements about it in the past. For example, contributing some universities to find a solution for a worldwide problem such as global warming is a good case in point, especially, If the participated in this project are in the first steps of the researches in this area, they cannot be expected to use the before achievements. Because they are the pioneers of studying and working in global-warming. While these universities can contribute well to address the problem without using the past advancements, they can make their own achievements like all other previous pioneers throughout history. Moreover, in some cases, an organization is formed to complete a job that was failed to finish in the past, but they cannot take advantage of the past achievements because the result of the previous work is completely destroyed or disappeared. For instance, cooperation in a committee working on finding the side effects of a specific medicine which its' previous documents and the result of examinations are not existed, disappearing in a war or burning in a fire accident. Hence, the job has to be done again with the vast cooperation of experts no matter that the past achievements are accessible or not.
On the other hand, even with the existence of too many past achievements, to make a perfect contribution, it is neither necessary nor easy to be strongly influenced by the previous advancements in that area. Although efficient participating in a team to reach the best result depends on inspiring as much as possible from the consequences of the similar past projects, we should not lose sight of the fact that being strongly influenced by the previous achievements faces a number of limitations in some regions. For example, in some remote areas which using high-speed internet is rarely possible and updated new books are not affordable in the libraries of the town, Cooperating in a team with taking the advantages of the previous jobs in the case is impossible because they have to spend too much effort, time and money to reach an insignificant amount of the past achievements that are out of their access. So, in this case, it would be more fruitful for individuals and the team to ignore past achievements. Instead, they can do their best to use their own knowledge and achievements to reach the best possible result.
In conclusion, under no circumstances are we allowed to generalize an exclusive way to be an efficient participant in a cooperation. Despite the importance of the result of the previous achievements in each case, there are absolutely numerous ways to play a significant role in a team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this statement, the writer claims tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms to be problematic in some aspects. To begin with, obviously, we cannot gene...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...th, obviously, we cannot generalize the writers assumption to all fields. Sometimes gro...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t achievements are accessible or not. On the other hand, even with the existen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts to reach the best possible result. In conclusion, under no circumstances ar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 100.0 58.6224719101 171% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2688.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04315196998 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11769536013 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465290806754 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 852.3 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.6282699655 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6111111111 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.21951772744 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193008251302 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637295164459 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465061653864 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114510532182 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411279850136 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.