Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Today's problems root at the past function of individuals and societies. The controversy surrounding is whether governments should attempt to solve the present problems rather than trying to address the predicted matters in the future. As far as I am concerned, addressing the causes of the probable problems in the future is as important as solving immediate problems of today. Because it can definitely reduce the number of heavy tolls imposed on society in the future.
The first reason is that preventing a probable issue can restrict the bigger problems. As problems are usually followed by more serious ones, projecting the causes and measuring them before happening is absolutely fruitful, especially in terms of health and global matters. For example, If the authorities predict the spread of a dangerous disease, can survive lots of people. In addition, a perfect political measurement can predict a contrary between countries and consequently prevent the heavy tolls of war in a community.
Secondly, solving a problem is always more expensive rather prevention. For instance, If governments tend to produce cars using efficiently oil that cause less amount of air pollution, can definitely prevent spending a large proportion of budget on various examination and researches in solving the effects of global warming caused by air pollution.
The third reason is that the government would allot less time and energy to solve the anticipated problems of the future rather than addressing them in the future. Because in the future they have to spend additional time to address the destructive effects of the problems besides solving the problem. For instance, if the state projects a strong storm and inform people to do any protecting measurement to be safe in the time of phenomenon, they would save lots of people and possesses. However, if they do not so, authorities have to spend numerous time and effort to address the destructive effects of the storm on people health and the city infrastructures.
In conclusion, projection and solving the probable cause of future problems is as important as solving the today's ones. Governments should do their best to allocate enough time, effort and forces to prevent happening future problems. As it is cheaper, safer and absolutely efficient for the following years, and it is fruitful for both individuals and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as solving immediate problems of today. Because it can definitely reduce the number of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...her than addressing them in the future. Because in the future they have to spend additi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'preventing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: preventing
...allocate enough time, effort and forces to prevent happening future problems. As it is che...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27631578947 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92029387964 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481578947368 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0717823829 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.941176471 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23176573257 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891763017148 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949758190055 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140305574963 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906489827071 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.