Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The writer of the issue claims that any field of work should step down every five years because regenerating the management system is undoubtedly the best way to succeed. I strongly agree with neither the claim nor the reason as I find both problematic.
Firstly, we cannot include all fields of endeavor in the mentioned policy. Stepping down in some aspects of social activities is neither possible nor fruitful. For example, changing the leadership in a business system may lead to significant achievements due to learning lots of new approaches to the members. However, this change in an educational system with an immutable policy cannot be well done. For instance, in an educational complex that constitute elementary and high school departments, changing the educational policy by the new manager can cause inevitable problems for students who were adopted with the precede policies. If the revitalization through leadership tends to change the educational programs such as order of lessons, the subject of courses and the time management of classes would decline the efficiency of old students and the teachers. So It can negatively affect the students' function and consequently would lead to the not only success of the system but also a failure in competition with other educational constant- policy systems.
Even if we assume that the new leadership policy may not hurt the function of the system, assigning a five_year period for all fields of community is not fairly beneficial. For example, in the educational complexed referred in the previous paragraph, the study duration of each student make up more than ten years, it is approximately two or Three leadership period, so experiencing the distinct leadership as a member of this system is inevitable. This surely can confuse both students and teachers in choosing the best-distinguished programs offered in different period. So the duration of the period should correspond with the program of each system.
On the other hand, we cannot accept that this is the best way of leading to success. There are numerous companies that are remarkably successful that were constant in leadership for many years. For example, the Apple firm which produced the most popular cell phones and computers in the past decades is sustainable in both management and leadership policies.
In the final analysis, we should not lose sight of the fact that revitalization through new leadership is can bring innovation and freshness for the individuals and the system. However, noting to this as the best way in any filed to achieve success in un unacceptable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lems for students who were adopted with the precede policies. If the revitalization through...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... achieve success in un unacceptable.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98598388697 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2552185128 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.111111111 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221230867967 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714608222782 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535353375804 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142304400939 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469458548343 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.