Essay topics: ISSUE TOPIC: The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The crux of the topic is that the talent of a renowned musician cannot be measured until the musician dies so that his or her fame interferes with an honest assessment. I personally disagree with the statement for the following reasons and I am going to provide some examples to bolster my stance.
The talent of a person cannot be depressed or denounced by the contemporaries or his or her fame can only be assessed after death. A persons talent must be judge by the veracity of his creation and must be assessed in his current era with his competitors. The situation might be changed after he died and people might not judge him properly because of sympathy. For example, we cannot judge Elvis Presley in our current era, he made his fame in his generation, he had composed music at his trend and we can not compare Elvis with current real singers.
Another point is that talent is not some tangible thing that assessed by some measurement. A person cannot create fame from thin air, he had to work hard for several years to gain that name. A persons fame or talent can not be oppressed by the current generation and neither he needs to be dead to prove his talent. For example, Messi and Ronaldo famous for their talent in this era that others and will be remembered by several generations, but we can not compare them with earlier era's player.
On the other hand, some people might argue that a famous person's talent cannot be assessed by the current generation, because he might influence the situations. Some musicians plagiarized their songs to be famous and they try to hide their chicanery with their power. But talent there are musicians who were famous in their generation and even they will be remembered for several generations from now on. Talent assessed on situations when the situation is turgid an only talent can rescue him from that situation. Talent can only measure by the uniqueness of his her work, for example, there were many musicians but A.R.Rahaman was awarded for his unique creations, same for other singers and music band like Coldplay or Pinkfloyed, they known for their authenticity.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that talents can be measured by the authenticity of a person's work and to measure talent people need not die, so that he can enjoy his hard work and fame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ame can only be assessed after death. A persons talent must be judge by the veracity of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... for several years to gain that name. A persons fame or talent can not be oppressed by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'eras'' or 'era's'?
Suggestion: eras'; era's
...ut we can not compare them with earlier eras player. On the other hand, some people...
^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
..., some people might argue that a famous persons talent cannot be assessed by the curren...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rahaman
...mple, there were many musicians but A.R.Rahaman was awarded for his unique creations, s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6862745098 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.547906997 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436274509804 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6541322734 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367142782894 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140729033158 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106086798884 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236335679953 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856065316096 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.