The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Greatness can come in many faces and it is difficult and debatable to define what is great. In this topic, author stated that greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by contemporaries. I disbelief this tenet and present my points to corroborate my belief.
From our early Human history, different scientist came and left their mark of greatness in this world. First of all, Newton who came before Einstein and Hawkins, can we denigrate him as comparison to others?
The greatness of Newton appreciated by the next generation as much as his contemporaries.
The Galileo, who was not believed by his contemporaries but his greatness admired by next generation and never questioned his greatness by his incomers.
In the past history, many scientists came at a similar time and their research contradict each other, for example of Darwin and Alfred Russell, they came with same theory at same time but Darwin became more famous, so we can observe that the greatness of an individual can be measured even by their contemporaries, as there is always a competition between two great tenets.
The greatness cannot only exemplify by the scientist or inventors but also by the great leaders who direct our society towards the modern era and their thought and belief became an ism. For example of Mathma Gandhi, who fights against British rulers and or Nelson Mandela, they are respected by the next generation and also by the peoples at their similar time.
In the conclusion, someone can argue that many beliefs questioned and modified by next generation, but I would say that without the predecessor's inventions any modification could not be possible, because without fail we can be corrected. Our predecessor came at the different time and it is not right to compare their greatness with those who live after them, their bestowal towards our society could not be neglected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds our society could not be neglected.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04716981132 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81999036081 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.5061678106 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461049392734 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172166258335 0.0831039109588 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181673704723 0.0758088955206 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204488582285 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129505295734 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.