Every individual in the society has the responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and reject unjust laws.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Throughout history, governments and societies have always had rules that people should allow them. These rules have been for better controlling the society, and due to their paramount importance, governments have always tried to develop and make them better. However, sometimes some governors cannot do their job best and lead to existence of imperfections rules which could destroy the society. so, a controversial question which is often raised in this area is whether every individual in a united society should obey all laws which governments make without regarding to their justice or injustice. whether one agrees or disagrees with this statement depends on the lens through which one is looking. I firmly contend that people have right and wisdom to determine pros and cons. In the following paragraphs, I am going to elaborate on my perspective.
The first reason why I advocate my point of view lies in the fact that as I have said in the previous paragraph, every person can recognize what is beneficial for them and make the best decision. In addition, I believe that no one should obey unfair laws and be quiet towards injustice and oppression. Therefore, people cannot close their eyes and admit everything which compelled them to obey just because it is rule. As an instance, in my country women had to wear their body and do not have freedom to choose their clothes. While, every individual have right to choose their own custom. so, in this situation if we say nothing, not only do they force us in other fields of human rights, but also it makes bigger and expands to our future generation and we are responsible towards our children in upcoming futures.
Another issue which should be taken into consideration is that people of a certain society should make their society a better place for themselves and their future generations with collaborating with each other. Thus, they have responsibility to correct the flaws of their country’s policies. based on the valid statistic, during the former century, every nation which its people have had alliance and resist unfair rules could better develop and flourish in subsequent years. this clearly shows that the more we try to value ourselves and do not allow other to make decision for us, the more we improve.
By way of encapsulating this notion, based on the arguments explored above, and with all due respect to the people who have opposite idea of mine, I once again reaffirm my position that every individual have right to make decision for themselves and discern what laws should they followed. but, that was the story in a nutshell; actually, there are a myriad of other reasons, supporting the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Throughout history, governments and soci...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... rules which could destroy the society. so, a controversial question which is ofte...
^^
Line 1, column 607, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
...egarding to their justice or injustice. whether one agrees or disagrees with this state...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to elaborate on my perspective. The first reason why I advocate my point...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t have freedom to choose their clothes. While, every individual have right to choose ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... have right to choose their own custom. so, in this situation if we say nothing, n...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... our children in upcoming futures. Another issue which should be taken into...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Based
...flaws of their country's policies. based on the valid statistic, during the form...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 488, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...velop and flourish in subsequent years. this clearly shows that the more we try to v...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ision for us, the more we improve. By way of encapsulating this notion, bas...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...discern what laws should they followed. but, that was the story in a nutshell; actu...
^^^
Line 13, column 357, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ry in a nutshell; actually, there are a myriad of other reasons, supporting the above ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99137931034 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66318972633 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7758699748 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.894736842 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155368861773 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504333590836 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405120243305 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103336258381 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00966786105813 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.