“Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
As civilizations develop, laws are enacted by the ruling government. Legislators create and change laws in response to current events, and revoke outdated rules or resolve present economic, political, and social dilemmas. In an ideal world, a set number of laws would make sure peace and prosperity within a society and keep amiable relations with foreign countries without adjustments. But that’s what happens in reality.
In order consider a law just, it needs to protect people’s liberties, livelihood, and give them opportunities to pursue their ambitions. Inversely, an unjust law does the opposite by encroaching on their freedoms, and using systemic means go keeping them from advancing their career, education, health, etc. Unjust laws support practices like: making weapons easily purchasable, permitting corporations to pollute the planet, allowing police departments to get away with police brutality, and many other actions that aren’t illegal, but still endanger citizens.
To set a standard for moral order, everyone must obey laws. If they’re not, then it sets a precedents that there’s an avenue for people to disobey. In most governments, people who don’t conform face reproductions; the main reason committing crimes isn’t preferable. My following just laws, citizens make sure the safety of their communities. Therefore it’s necessary to have every person follow them. Alternatively, if a law is unjust, then disobeying won’t be of any use. Actively opposing the laws won’t fix them, but instead punish the people who aim to set a positive example. Instead that same energy could be put towards organizing citizens and using democratic means to change legislation to protect their prosperity.
By disobeying laws, activists can cause an uproar, which in some cases can further a movement. But it is safer and more profitable to appeal to ruling legislator's common sense and empathy to help them realize whether a law is unjust and work together to fix it. Every person as a part of society must aim to make it better for themselves and their neighbors. That means after the rules to keep everyone safe, and actively using their voice and representations to change the unjust ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a precedent' or simply 'precedents'?
Suggestion: a precedent; precedents
...laws. If they're not, then it sets a precedents that there's an avenue for people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e sure the safety of their communities. Therefore it's necessary to have every perso...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ople who aim to set a positive example. Instead that same energy could be put towards o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, therefore, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45428571429 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98436880141 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625714285714 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0034489084 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.473684211 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240819831485 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742153361788 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382232205625 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135500694167 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034648895439 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.