So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is often argued that laws concerning the must to keep the seat belt fasten while travelling on a car should be limited by age, since adults are able to understand the entity of every risk they are facing and they are able to take this kind of decision by their own. However, even if this claim could seem reasonable at first glance, in fact it could lead to many drawbacks.
First, even if, generally speaking, adults are always wise and able to understand whether they are taking a risk or not, we should make a distinction when we talk about driving. In fact, in the roads drivers' behavior does not depend only on themselves but also on how other people are driving. For this reason, even if someone is supposed to be the best driver in the world he cannot know in advance if he is going to meet the worst one and if he is going to have a car accident with him while driving. Even if this can seem just a worst case scenario, it should be taken into serious consideration because people who are terrible at driving are much more of people who are good at it. All this is to say that since it is really difficult to evaluate ourself's ability to drive and even supposing we are good driver other people could not be that skilled, the fast of the seat belt must remain mandatory for everybody.
In addition, the implementation of this policy would be much difficult to be managed. In fact, the definition of what the word "adult" means should be clarified by putting an age cutoff. Suppose for example to consider adults people who are older than 23. By doing that it would be much difficult for police to understand if a person who is not wearing the seat belt is allowed to do so or not. Therefore, since it is not possible to make a check stopping every single car on the road, the seat beat's rule would hbe likely not to be respected by the youngest.
On the other side of the argument, it is true to say that it is way more confortable to drive without having the seat belt fasten, especially while making short trip. However, the risk to put our life in danger during accident is too high and ,thus, the drawbacks of such a law would strongly overweight its benefits.
In conclusion, people are not completely wrong arguing that with the change of this law their quality of driving would get better. However, while thinking about its practical consequences, a deeper reasonment should be done. Firstly, the risk of death or of bad medical diseases for car accidents would rise dramatically, since people would not be protected anymore from the power of the airbag and from all other factors deriving from a car accident. Secondly, many troubles will be found during the implementation because it does not exist any instrument that allows us to understand just with a fast sight whether a person in a car is an adult of not and, thus, it would be almost impossible to force people who are not adults to respect the law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...s often argued that laws concerning the must to keep the seat belt fasten while travell...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ile driving. Even if this can seem just a worst case scenario, it should be taken...
^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n danger during accident is too high and ,thus, the drawbacks of such a law would ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52247191011 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51045381302 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473782771536 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.4886409431 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 5.21951772744 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140880196847 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498264189819 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289521713966 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861948895622 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270820781347 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.