The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Self-knowlege is the discovery of oneself by experincing and trying out different things life has to offer.What one learns by self in unknown environments cannot be thought or learnt in any book found. An expirenced person will always fair better in life than a person who has only taken knowledge from the books and not applied it any where.I strongly agree with this suggestion that the first step to self knowledge is the rejection of the fimiliar for the following two reasons.
There are two ways of aquring knowledge one is through other peoples expiriences (books, journals, magazines, etc) in this one has a very parochial scope of what the author has mentioned or experimented on and it limites the readers to only to the authors perspective whereas in self-knowledge on tries and expirences the things and maybe come up with an even better approach or even find something new which had not been discovered. For instance, time and time again scientist had to go against the popular notion to prove there theroy if they hadn't rejected the gimiliar we would be still beliving that the eath is the center of the universe and all the other planets revolve around it.
Self-knowledge leads to greater understanding and compels on to thing in a more broader way and is not restricted by others discovery or opinions. Gaining as much knowlege is important to be successful in life. If one tries to open a new restraunt and wants it to be successful he has to try new things and come up with a dish that is unique which seperates him from the competition rather than just copying some culinary book and cook the same mundane dishes that even his competitors can cook and serve. If one wants to succed in this highly competitive world which is ever so changing one has to reject the fimilar and come up with something unique and new to stand out.
The differnece between ordinary people and successful people is that they move out of there comfort zone and reject the fimiliar and try to find bettwe ways to things that already exist rather than just accepting the way the things are.One cannot grow and succeed unless he tries to get out from his comfort level and fight against the "obvious" elements of his surroundings. For example Apple in 2016 compelety removed the headphonejack from its devices at that time it seemed a foolish move to do and many in the industry thought this way goingto be the down fall of Apple but as it stands today Apple is leading in the industry and many other competitor followed Apples lead and also removed the head-phone jack from there devices
Of course some may say that the familiar provides a staring point for people and a base that can encourage futher deveploment but often amount of time the familiar is faulty and instead of helping obsures the progress one could have made by just rejecting it. Self-knowledge is not only the best way to attain knowledge but also is the best way to retain it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...by experincing and trying out different things life has to offer.What one learns by se...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
... out different things life has to offer.What one learns by self in unknown environme...
^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...ledge from the books and not applied it any where.I strongly agree with this suggestion t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
... the books and not applied it any where.I strongly agree with this suggestion tha...
^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d it limites the readers to only to the authors perspective whereas in self-knowledge o...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ar notion to prove there theroy if they hadnt rejected the gimiliar we would be still...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'broader' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: broader
...erstanding and compels on to thing in a more broader way and is not restricted by others dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...re broader way and is not restricted by others discovery or opinions. Gaining as much ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: One
...n just accepting the way the things are.One cannot grow and succeed unless he tries...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71760154739 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66393944599 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497098646035 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 23.0359550562 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 154.988829243 60.3974514979 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 221.727272727 118.986275619 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.0 23.4991977007 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114388369772 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485447640518 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034687543386 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721101863771 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334057931939 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 14.1392134831 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.23 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 12.1743820225 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 11.2143820225 185% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.