The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement claims that one will improve the self-knowledge by rejecting what is familiar to you. I completely agree with the author's recommendation as the history shows several luminaries who succeeded who followed this approach. one can improve the self-knowledge by learning new things rather than having a parochial mindset.
By rejecting the things that are familiar to you, one tries to try out multile things and in the due course he may find it difficult and sometimes may fail. but, by continuously trying out multiple things will help him/her learning and expanding horizons. there is no harm in having knowledge of things with are not familiar or outside one's intrests. By rejecting new things one will come up with new stategies to find solutions to problems, which may sometimes lead to new inventions. To illustrate, Alexander Flemming in his constant pursuit to find medicine to cure some prevalent desiase of his time--although have certain medications, which are not effective--came up with new discovery with is now known as pencillin. In addition, Columbus on his search for America found out a sea-route and discovered a new country India.
The above mentioned examples shows that by rejecting the familiar, one is in a good shape to find out more strategies--some may be improvised--and may sometimes leads to new discoveries and inventions. Many of the inventiones in the history are the products of this recommendation. Moreover, the whole research community is based on this and is continuously striving for improvised versions of the alredy existing solutions. For example, now-a-days internet is mandatory for everyone for their daily activities. The first internet supplied through cables and later shifted to air-trasmission which was followed by and improvised version 2G, then 3G and then 4G. research has not stopped there and is continuously striving to improve it to come up with improved spectrum. this constant motto of improving solutions and enhancing knowledge is possible only by rejecting what is known.
However, there are some problems with rejecting what is already known. Earlier, leaves are used as plates and then shifted to metal plates. These days some plastic untensils are prevalent which is degrating the environment, which is bad. Hence there should be a thought about the safety before getting inured to the new invention. but, the number of pros outnumbered the cons.
In conclusion, I agree with the author's recomendation for the above mentioned resons. but that self-knowledge should be used judiciously and should not be harmful t
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...iar to you. I completely agree with the authors recommendation as the history shows sev...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...o succeeded who followed this approach. one can improve the self-knowledge by learn...
^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...nd it difficult and sometimes may fail. but, by continuously trying out multiple th...
^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...im/her learning and expanding horizons. there is no harm in having knowledge of thing...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Research
...ovised version 2G, then 3G and then 4G. research has not stopped there and is continuous...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 772, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e it to come up with improved spectrum. this constant motto of improving solutions a...
^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...egrating the environment, which is bad. Hence there should be a thought about the saf...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...the safety before getting inured to the new invention. but, the number of pros outnumbered th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...re getting inured to the new invention. but, the number of pros outnumbered the con...
^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ndation for the above mentioned resons. but that self-knowledge should be used judi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30024213075 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10344566346 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506053268765 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7691742781 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1739130435 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17391304348 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189798603984 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530084800085 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470555532112 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110476702634 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324613015458 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.