"The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your

Essay topics:

"The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The given statement states a maxim that the first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. Self-knowledge is simply the awakening of one's true self. It is all about knowing yourself, your inner soul and understanding the purpose of your life. While I agree with the recommendation here, that you must relinquish the familiar ideas to come closer to yourself; there are certainly few scenarios where it may not hold true. The text further lucidifies on the recommendation.

It is undoubtedly a fact that as we grow we come across several ideas and idealogies, which we incorporate within ourselves to get a better understanding of how the world works. Somehow in our journey these play a part and mould us towards our future selves. We imbibe and learn from our surroundings and over a passage of time everything becomes familiar. But in that we do lose a part of ourself and start thinking about the purpose for which we were born.

This is when we need to unlearn.There is a common phrase to learn, unlearn and relearn. Whatever was our initial learning is what we are familiar with. But now when we are trying to relearn about ourself on the path of self-knowledge, there is something that holds us back and that is the previous worldly wisdom of ours. So in order to accomplish our goal of relearning we need to unlearn and reject whatever we were well-acquainted with.

So, I believe that we do need to reject the beliefs, that have always been familiar to us and start from scratch to know ourself. We need to enter the nascent or inchoate stage and work towards growing ourselves in a new light. However, there lies a possible contradiction here. When we say our circumstances have build us to the point we are, how can we reject everything foundational to us in order to know our roots. That is just the point where the recommendation fails to strike a chord with me.

Everything till this very moment has played a significant and monumental role in shaping us to our current form. In a fraction of a second how can we decide to forego all at once, just to start a journey all over again? Wouldn't it be foolish of us to do something so strange? I believe this is one of those things that are cryptic and enigmatic at the same time. Till date we have always followed a pre-laid path to move ahead hence, today to gain self-knowledge we are confounded with the dilemma or conundrum which handicaps our judgement? But isn't it the best beginning. Since, we are embarking on a new journey shouldn't we stop making decisions using our previous algorithm and move towards a new method which will not only be enriching but also satisfying? The path to self-knowledge is just that.

Hence, yes it rightly said that the first step towards self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. Though there are instances where this may confound us and the path may seem obscure but that's just a good start according to me and would indeed help us to leave what we have always been carrying in our head in the form of familiar knowledge.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...orn. This is when we need to unlearn.There is a common phrase to learn, unlearn an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whatever we were well-acquainted with. So, I believe that we do need to reject ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Wouldn't
...just to start a journey all over again? Wouldnt it be foolish of us to do something so ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rt a journey all over again? Wouldnt it be foolish of us to do something so strang...
^^
Line 9, column 547, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...drum which handicaps our judgement? But isnt it the best beginning. Since, we are em...
^^^^
Line 9, column 616, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ince, we are embarking on a new journey shouldnt we stop making decisions using our prev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nd us and the path may seem obscure but thats just a good start according to me and w...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...head in the form of familiar knowledge.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 79.0 33.0505617978 239% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67286245353 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82748397605 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479553903346 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6143381315 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.60714285714 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131766619868 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433160617938 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515378523309 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085555137573 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717470324535 0.0667264976115 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.