Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Education is the basic need of every human being and, teachers or parents are the torch bearers of this task to enlighten students. Learning is everywhere, at home, school, parks and so on, which helps students to move ahead in life and achieve intended results. The prompt recommends that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. I strongly disagree with this for following reasons.
Firstly, formal education, which is being made after due deliberation for the wellbeing and advancement of students, cannot be thought as circumscribing. For instance, a child who has a high intelligence quotient and another child who has, low intelligence quotient study together. In a class both of them has same curriculum, and it has been made in such a way, that it will push the boundaries for intelligent child. Simultaneously, it will help other child to burgeon his knowledge to at least an average level.
Secondly, home-school can frustrate the knowledge of a student in one direction, rather than making them aware and protean. For example, parents who are teaching their child at home, thinking, they can give better knowledge and show them the right path for career, may not always be right. It will restrict the child just to focus on a particular subject as mathematics and science and not giving her liberty to study literature, arts and other subjects. These subjects would have helped to open the creative part of brain.
Finally, interaction among students is also a must. To illustrate, a student who are having a privilege of formal education, get chance to take part in extra-curricular activity. These activities in turn help to develop being a, team player, leadership, and solo roles. Also, they, help the students to take bigger challenges in life and make them closer towards realities of corporate challenges.
Opponents of the issue might argue that, formal education is not able to cope up with the speed of technological impact on humans. Today's industry wants students to be felicitous for companies and apply the knowledge. The education which is being delivered in class rooms are still the same old and not even close to industrial expectations. This leads to increase in unemployment and the pool keeps on increasing. Also, to become germane for industries employability criteria, students has to take extra courses.
To recapitulate, I believe the best way forward should be a mixed-model. However, I believe the formal education should be a mixed education, where, students can gain classroom knowledge and requires a certification in the field of dynamic subjects. This way it will help students to develop holistically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...ctivities in turn help to develop being a, team player, leadership, and solo roles...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18264840183 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95353676335 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566210045662 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9891959096 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5833333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16481760776 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486571648078 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070753230905 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089269236944 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673746456155 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.