Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The Government officials are the representatives of the Government of that country and they usually do the things that should be done by the Government for the people of that country. Government officials are sometimes bound to follow the rules that maintained in the constitutions, but mostly they have the power to choose their actions based on the surrounding conditions. The prompt is stated that the government official should use their excellence in the time of taking decisions for the welfare of the general people instead of following the people's demand without using any judgment. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the prompt that the government officials should not follow the people's word without any question, rather than they should listen everyone's opinion and then they should use their judgment because of the following two reasons.
Firstly, the Government officials are recruited by the public commissions of that country after different layers of examination which includes written and oral as well. After showing the capabilities of critical thinking and reasoning power the government officials get the chance to serve the people of an area where they have been posted after the completion of joining procedure. They have the thinking power in critical situations and the government has recruited them because they can tackle the worst scenario using their judging power. For example, a school going poor boy from a rural area have theft something out of hunger and get caught by the local people. Initially, the boy will be taken to the police station for the punishment and for taking other legal actions against the boy. In this case the local people will ask for the punishment of that boy, but the police can’t just follow the local people's words and take actions against that little boy. The police need to investigate the situations, should talk with the victim, should look for an eye witness, and after all that the police should look after the constitution for the severity of the punishment the boy should get. So, the police need to use their own judgment in such cases, otherwise, there can be a huge mistakes like taking wrong actions in wrong time against the wrong people because most of the time people instigate by the situations and don't think rationally.
Secondly, when government officials start to follow the words of people, then people won't take them seriously and the possibilities of immoral work will increase eventually. For example, when a criminal murdered someone, he wouldn't get frightened by the law systems as he/she know that they can control the government officials like the police, the judge etc. In such cases, they will try to give money to the government officials to withdraw the cases against them.
This will hamper the usual situations of the society and have a negative impact on the people. Then other people will do miscreants without any afraid this will break the harmony in the society. So, how come anyone say that the government officials should follow the people's word without using their judgmental power?
Some may argue that the government officials can misuse their power if people don't have any say against them. It may be true but in every case there is a similar percentage of possibilities of positive and negative impact. Since the government officials are bound to follow the constitutions, there will be transparency of their actions.
Finally, the government officials are more rational thinker than the general people and the government give them the power to take decisions for the people based on their talent and excellence. So, the government officials should use their judgment to solve problems, it will maintain the unity and peace between the people and the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... people instigate by the situations and dont think rationally. Secondly, when gover...
^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e, when a criminal murdered someone, he wouldnt get frightened by the law systems as he...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...frightened by the law systems as he/she know that they can control the government of...
^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ing their judgmental power? Some may argue that the government officials can misus...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...icials can misuse their power if people dont have any say against them. It may be tr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, after all, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3159.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 621.0 442.535393258 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.991980728 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60663822169 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404186795491 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 956.7 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4285375726 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.347826087 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04347826087 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402786993337 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135929693168 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081195795479 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245102783652 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736379616114 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.