Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government officials are appointed for the betterment of a country, a state, or a region. Hence, they should not just rely on their judgment but also account for the will of the people they serve.
Firstly, let us say, two groups of people are debating on an issue and a government official has to reconcile the matter. In this case, if an official only hears one side of the case and make a decision, it will be an injustice to the other group of people. Listening to both sides of the story is always necessary to make justice. Any government official should not make any hasty decisions by coming under the influence of any specific group. Hence it is better to rely on own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of people.
In addition to that, people's thoughts are sometimes wavy and capricious. Many times, people do not land on the same conclusion. People always agree on those matters which are beneficial for themselves. For instance, in ancient days, when two people had counter opinions about a specific topic, they had to settle it with the help of the king as he was an outsider and hence could take an impartial decision based on his own judgment. Likewise, the government officials are the viewers of the matter. Hence, an impartial decision by them serves the best for everyone.
Sometimes, relying on their own judgment could not always be beneficial for the people. Government officials outlook the problem but never actually suffer. Hence, there is a possibility that the solution offered by them does not resolve the problem completely. To illustrate, recently the Indian government had passed the Farm bills to empower the farmers, yet they had raised their voice against it. Because the bill had many arguments which were specious, thus might indirectly affect the farmers adversely. Hence, it is necessary to account for the opinions of people to include their views before passing any decision.
To sum up, one can say that, it is necessary for the government officials to rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. But while fulfilling this necessity, government officials should also not forget to take into account the opinions of people.
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason 66
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate 66
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throug 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...er the influence of any specific group. Hence it is better to rely on own judgment ra...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, look, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92612137203 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65430897427 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493403693931 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6150559084 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9047619048 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466356335327 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131262861657 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150712066722 0.0758088955206 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294746534143 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136389819244 0.0667264976115 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.