Although it is important for the government to focus and solve the immediate problems at hand, it is equally important to focus on the future problems that the country might face. Hence, making sure that the country does not find it extremely difficult to deal with the problems in the future when the time arrives.
Consider the recent crashes in the stock market in India. All the major industries, mainly auto industry, FMCG companies and the banking sector, are facing huge losses and are a ten-year low in terms of growth. These industries are the backbone of the nation providing high levels of employment and crores of rupees in taxes to the government. In order to turn things around, the leaders of various industries met the finance minister of the country seeking for some reforms and concessions in taxes. The finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, made some promises to these leaders giving a few short term solutions. This lead to widespread criticism from various critics and other leaders, because, these solutions only focused on dealing with the short term problems. The government should have rather taken some other well planned out reforms which would lead to a steady growth in the Indian economy. Hence, this example clearly shows us the drawbacks of government focusing on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to focus on the future of the country.
Another example where the government has failed to focus on the anticipated problems of the future is the traffic congestion in metropolitan cities. Ten years back, the government would have never anticipated that traffic condition in major cities would be come to such a grave situation in India. The consequence of this mistake is widely visible everyday by the people who travel to work facing extreme difficulty to drive in such traffic conditions. The government should have anticipated how fast the cities were growing and hence, made adequate plans for the future. The failure to recognize problems early, has led India to become one of the worst countries in terms of traffic management.
Additionally, let us consider the ban on use of plastic which was implemented very recently. It was only now that the government realized the devastating effects of plastics on the environment. But, the damage has already been done to the environment with plastic bottles and covers flooding the water bodies of the country. It has also been horrifying to see the problems faced by the fishes which accidentally consume these plastics dumped in rivers and oceans.
The above examples prove that the government should give equal importance to future planning of the country in addition to focusing on short term problems. Hence, it should focus on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the the future and come up with long-term solutions rather than finding easy short-term solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ce, made adequate plans for the future. The failure to recognize problems early, ha...
^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ng to solve the anticipated problems of the the future and come up with long-term solut...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ng to solve the anticipated problems of the the future and come up with long-term solut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63190856393 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2884398238 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04761904762 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32546053183 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885571923157 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126694992441 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185679336548 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087283532501 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.