Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students
Governments should satisfy the needs of education of each person. However, it will not be possible to offer education free of charge to all students. Therefore, I partially agree with the statement.
The governments should not provide each person with free college education, it will place a heavy financial burden on the governments. For example, in Taiwan, many universities will offer a variety of physical courses to students to learn, such as baseball and football. These courses will need a good deal of professionals to teach the students, and thus the colleges may need to cost additional funds to hire these sports coaches. If these fees are up to one million dollars per month, it will be a really heavy burden for the colleges. If the colleges do not charge tuition fees from the college students and not receive enough subsidies from the Taiwanese government, the colleges may not be able pay these sports coaches for the high salaries. By contrast, if the colleges obtain the tuition fees from these college students, the colleges will be able to provide substantial sports courses for the students because the colleges will have enough money to hire professional coaches.
Indeed, some people argue that many poor people could not pay the tuition fees because of their economic situations. These students may need to do some part time job to get enough money to maintain their basic needs, and they will not have extra money to pay the tuition fees. As a result, these students may choose to give up their studies at the universities and find jobs with higher salaries to lead their lives. If they choose to abandon their studies at the colleges, they may not be able to change their fates by the education of colleges. By contrast, if the governments decide to provide these poor students with free education of universities, they will be able to learn many professional courses, such as data structure and algorithm, and accomplish many practical projects. With this professional knowledge and practical projects, these poor students can receive lots of interview opportunities from many world-class software companies, such as Google and Amazon. These students may find jobs with higher salaries which are up to fifty thousand dollars per month, and thus these poor students can obtain more chances to change their fate and lead a better lives.
Therefore, the governments should only provide the free college and university education for the poor students and still charge the tuition fees from other students. For one thing, the colleges can have enough funds to operate their businesses and offer more professional courses with high quality to the students. For another thing, the poor student will not need to worry about the tuition fees because they can utilize the subsidies from the governments to pay the tuition fees. Also, these poor students will not need to do part time jobs to earn the money to pay the tuition fees, and thus these students will have more time to master the professional courses. These students will have better chances to change their fates.
To sum up, I partially agree with the statement. The government should only provide the poor students with the free education and still charge the tuition fees from other students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ons. These students may need to do some part time job to get enough money to maintain the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 529, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...these poor students will not need to do part time jobs to earn the money to pay the tuiti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, another thing, for example, such as, as a result, for another thing, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 33.0 12.4196629213 266% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04411764706 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56314870682 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.345588235294 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0858031472 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.304347826 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.652173913 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306393230979 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114095057261 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114561349182 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239092526369 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808704797936 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.