Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
As various levels of academic performances shown in colleges, some scholars posted that, “a part of the reasons for the differences is placed by tuition charged by institutions, the financial burdens distract students from study. Therefore, government should offer free of charge to students in college.”
I agree the scholars` opinion that financial burdens could distract students from academic focus, however, to offer free of charge is not a perfect solution to the problem. Free of charge could potentially have a negative impact on not only students themselves, but also institute, and government.
Some people might argue, the merits of free of charge are obvious. Without vexation over money, the time students spent on jobs could shift to study; and family, as well, would not worry about financial status for their children. At last, it is an auspicious policy for students.
However, as said above, the free of financial could really transfer to escalate of academic performance or would be counterproductively lower the performances. Free of charge relaxes the nerves of student on financial matters, however, the relaxation might lead to irresponsibility of study; with the pressure of tuition, students have the incentive to not to spend money over the same course again would push students to study to pass and to get a desirable score; without the pressure, the incentive is gone, students would have a peace of mind to fail classes, since there are always free chances to make it up. The sense of responsibility would gradually disappear.
Free of charge could have negative ripple effects on institutions and governments. Free of charge relaxes of financial burden from students, but the burden is loading on institutions and governments. Free of charge on tuition does not mean researches do not need to be fund, or teachers would not need to be paid. By subtracting of revenues coming from students, institutions and government would need to figure out solutions to compensate the gap. Government would have more budget made for education, and institutions would have to coming up with ideas to gain commercial benefits. The sequential effects of other stakeholders need to be fully analyzed.
Indeed, there are countries that that offers almost free of charge on tuition for students in college, such as China. However, the outcome is not satiable. Almost all major Universities in China are government fund and charge for a minimum price tag on tuition. However, the fund is limited compare to the demands, and the distribution of the limited budget does not go evenly to each university. Therefore, in order to acquire more funding from government, there are venal corruption occurred during the distribution of funding, such as bribery, paybacks to decision makers.
With shortage of funding, salaries could not be fully paid; thus, the trend of professors having another job and treat professing as a part-time job is prevalence nowadays in China. Indeed, the teaching qualities is discounted, and as the responsibility of professors shifted from education to business, there are less care from professors about students, thus, students are careless of their academic performances. The negative circulation would keep spinning till it out of control.
Overall, free of charge on tuition is a good idea to release students` financial concerns; instead, government and institutions could open more part-time positions for colleges students of related areas; it not only reduces the money pressure, but also could help students better practice the knowledge they learn in class. Also, more scholarship is another alternative to release financial burden, and to motivate students on academic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oading on institutions and governments. Free of charge on tuition does not mean rese...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3163.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 588.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37925170068 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99309050134 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 974.7 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.2028669087 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.52 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.52 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247286310161 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687909583558 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721387475826 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114144802929 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472737923832 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.