Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve

Essay topics:

Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

The speaker make a threshold that governments officials who are engaged in different governing bodies should strong rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. I strongly concede with the speaker claim that governments employee should be well institutionalized and autonomous in order to carry out different decision which they pursue in their working field without biasing the people of different races, ethnics groups and religion.
Turning first to the speaker threshold claim that government officers should be strongly qualified and capable of taking justifiable decision while doing their duties in their working sites. For instance, government employee who work in National Electricity Department must carry out their jobs efficient without creating bias situation towards the general public. Thus, in order to do so, they must keep their strong connectivity with the people living over that area in which they work. Moreover, such employee should be capable of taking radical judgement on the field in which they pursue their duty so as to provide efficient services towards the local citizen over that area. Therefore, such leadership skills must be there with such employee so that local people may keep faith in them.
Turning to the second point, government officials should work in their jobs taking the sentiments and ideology of general people. For instance, if their working nature is hurdled by the emotion and feeling of the people then they will be lacked in making effective judgement which will ultimately threatened them in accomplishing their undergoing work in desired time period. Similarly, government candidates should also make their own strategic plans and schedules while doing their jobs in certain local area. On doing so, it will obviously facilitated them during their working tenure. Hence, it is true that governments personnel should rely on their own judgments.
Some may argue that it is the duty of governing bodies to take the will of the public while making different plans before implementation. For instance, if the projects of hydro power when launched in certain area, then at that time government officials should strongly take the advice of the people regarding the geographical torpography and structure of that area. Without taking the appropriate suggestions of the people, it is not sure that the projects which are going to conduct in that area will be ever sustained. However, I believed that this point is flawed since the sustainability and topographical information about the project only become fruitful when different scientific study and research carried. So, it doesn't sound suitable to take the verdict of the people in order to carry out different research plan. Therefore, government officials should rely acutely in their decision before implementing in public region.
In sum, different government employees should carry out their own judgement quite efficiently taking the justifiable ideas and suggestions from the general public so that each citizen of the people keep their faith in government bodies. While doing so, equitable and peaceful country can be designed where none of the individuals felt biased from the governing bodies of the nation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
The speaker make a threshold that governments officials ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...gly concede with the speaker claim that governments employee should be well institutionaliz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...out creating bias situation towards the general public. Thus, in order to do so, they must kee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which they work. Moreover, such employee should be capable of taking radical judg...
^^
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e field in which they pursue their duty so as to provide efficient services towards the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'facilitate'
Suggestion: facilitate
...al area. On doing so, it will obviously facilitated them during their working tenure. Hence...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... working tenure. Hence, it is true that governments personnel should rely on their own judg...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... rely on their own judgments. Some may argue that it is the duty of governing bodies...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 722, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ific study and research carried. So, it doesnt sound suitable to take the verdict of t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tifiable ideas and suggestions from the general public so that each citizen of the people keep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3918128655 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74390689987 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432748538012 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.461157579 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.65 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399514984868 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14569247144 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123324310913 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26544544315 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106900161638 0.0667264976115 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.