Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” Benjamin Franklin’s axiom holds true for many aspects of one’s life or broader societal issues. This prescription can be vitally important for the governments of today when crafting their agendas and when formulating their national budgets. While governments should be continuously addressing the issues at hand each day, those in charge should be vigilant to prepare and anticipate problems of the future. This government preparedness for future events can be crucial in such examples surrounding climate change or a national health emergency.
It is nearly universally accepted that the climate is changing in response to human activity. Further scientific evidence has shown this effect is causing warming that could potentiate stronger storms, longer draughts, and other detrimental environmental changes. If one holds to this claim then he or she could see how important government involvement could be in the solution. As an example, the Unites States operates on a capitalistic economy that left unchecked by some government regulations could lead to future environmental worsening through air pollution. The government could take the stance of allowing businesses to operate however they decide is most profitable without consideration of future problems that this may allow. But, as many experts have pointed out this policy of ignoring future problems in exchange for maximum profits today will ultimately end in failure for society. As such, it is in everyone’s best interest to have governments to try and anticipate these future issues, like climate change, without being hyper focused on only the daily issues.
As another example of the importance of governments preparing for future events, one only has to look at the current state of affairs the US finds itself when dealing with the novel coronavirus pandemic. It is apparent that the US healthcare infrastructure was not adequately prepared to handle such a massive influx of effected patients. Nurses, doctors, and other frontline workers are running out of vital protective equipment and life saving devices. This pandemic can be taken as an example of how governments should always be looking forward and preparing itself and its citizens for a future crisis such as this global healthcare emergency.
Therefore, as presented in the issue prompt, I disagree with the notion that governments can essentially focus only on current events. The most successful nations have governments that not only deal with current issues but adequately prepare for future problems it may face.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... change or a national health emergency. It is nearly universally accepted that t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 966, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...’s best interest to have governments to try and anticipate these future issues, like cl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46551724138 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90198378086 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573891625616 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2314472555 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.529411765 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146547602815 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511202617378 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400544927126 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100131938446 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320927571055 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.