Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Every government in their tenure faces numerous issues. It can be new, or long-running like poverty or can be a futuristic problem that the government has just anticipated. Given the restricted budget, it is very difficult for the government to solve all the problems and have to choose the most important one. The prompt advocates that government should always choose the immediate ones as they are present and leave the future problems for the future. I agree with the prompt in general but there can be several other serious scenarios where later one can be a better choice for these three reasons.
First of all, the path to solving immediate problems is definitive, tried-and-tested, and can be easy to accomplish as compared to futuristic anticipated problems. For instance, most of the immediate problems like hunger, education, and corruption are already solved by some of the developed nations. Therefore, developing countries like India can take examples from these countries, and consequently, these problems will be easy to solve as compared to other prognosticated problems. For example, the literacy rate in India is around 40% and it is one of the most difficult problems faced by the government whereas developed countries like the USA hosts some of the best universities in the world and have literacy rate above 80%. India can refer to some of the actions taken by the USA to solve its education problem. Further, solving an immediate problem will particularly help lower class people, whose upliftment is far more important than 5G internet. I am not conveying that 5G is not important but problems that encumber the growth of the country are far more important and should be the primacy of the government.
Further, even if we assume that situations are not similar and the same solution cannot be implemented, the government definitely has more insights, knowledge, and data for immediate problems. Therefore, designing and implementing solutions for these problems will be more practical and have a better chance of success. For example, One day India gets the information that China, its neighboring country has upgraded its military power. China has bought several new fighter jets and has upgraded their weapons. In response to this new parlous danger, Indian Government also decides to upgrade their weapon but does not have any information on the fighter jets and weapons china bought. In the lack of information, it is very difficult for the government to anticipate and devise a good strategy to tackle the issue. On the other hand, about the issue of poverty, they have much more data, knowledge, and results of earlier actions. The government will have complete information like which states, are there any particular communities or any particular areas which are much more affected and this can really help to devise a better strategy to tackle this particular issue.
But there is always a fine line between the immediate problems and future-immediate problem. It is possible that, in the above example, china's military upgrade has posted some serious national security threats, and the Government of India should do everything in their hands to make its position stronger. Hence, the choice between immediate and futuristic problem cannot be that simple and should be made considering all the factors.
In the end, the main motive of solving any problem is to make lives better. Every problem is important, some may be easy or hard but it is very important to choose one that matters the most.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n, and corruption are already solved by some of the developed nations. Therefore, developin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...racy rate above 80%. India can refer to some of the actions taken by the USA to solve its e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2963.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13518197574 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8048416777 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436741767764 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 948.6 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8693889662 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.52 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.08 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230415005953 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076646107319 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550122552863 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141780950388 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427006057802 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.