Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Every single community or society has minor and major problems according to their contexts like geographical, political, or economic. As we are inventing novel solutions to make our lives easier, efficient, and faster on the other hand every innovation has its backdrop and some negative side. so the problems arising in the society are detrimental to the development which can stymie the society's growth. prioritizing the current problems
will be conducive and can marginalize future issues. Thus I strongly agree that creating the solution for the present problems not only solves the current issues but, also can hamper future consequences for the following three reasons.
Firstly, for any community or society, the development plans are made by governments or local statutory bodies. But, sometimes governments turn greedy in the time of elections and offer some sham things to people in which they fall in a trap. so instead of dealing with the current problems, they bribe the people and the whole system gets deteriorated. pragmatically, the government should try to solve present problems which can hobble future corollary. For example,
in the monsoon season, the sewage and gutters of the city overflow or jammed, and this may cause flood conditions. so instead of cleaning gutters, the government proposes a flood resilient plan and which never practically occurs. but, this might
possible in ideal conditions of government and might seldom because it required a strong political party. So if the government had done sewage work first then flood situation will not happen and the proposed plans will dose not hold the water
Secondly, if the government is planning for future problems then they overlooked the current situations and this might augment more consequences in the community. This can waste the time, money, and hard work of government because the future is
unpredictable. For instance, if in any particular area potholes on the road is a major concern then the government should look for that first rather than proposing the new flyovers or bridges. They should renovate the old first and then
there will not need for flyovers.
Moreover, the second part of the statement does not hold water if the first part is catered appropriately. Rather than predicting the expected issue, they must first find what is the cause of the issue or origin of this can be conducive
and will not create any dilemma in people. proposing the new solutions and haruspicating the problems is considerable but should be done cogently and comprehensively then it will be profitable.
In totality, the government first understands what is the desideratum of the current context rather than just planning. Making the strong funded government is plum in the time of recession but this prediction falls apart if the current economic
system stands strong. Thus identifying and solving current issues is more beneficial rather than just haruspicating the things equivocally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...as its backdrop and some negative side. so the problems arising in the society are...
^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Prioritizing
...t which can stymie the societys growth. prioritizing the current problems will be conducive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...cive and can marginalize future issues. Thus I strongly agree that creating the solu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...to people in which they fall in a trap. so instead of dealing with the current pro...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pragmatically
...and the whole system gets deteriorated. pragmatically, the government should try to solve pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...d, and this may cause flood conditions. so instead of cleaning gutters, the govern...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...lan and which never practically occurs. but, this might possible in ideal conditio...
^^^
Line 10, column 44, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Proposing
... will not create any dilemma in people. proposing the new solutions and haruspicating the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27731092437 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83161170661 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497899159664 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5328416577 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.97078651685 241% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252994607728 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776488501887 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823236051775 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927549477476 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541615099172 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.