Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Television channels aired a myriad number of commercials lately. Showing the advertisements is becoming their business of earning money and profitable as well. However, there are no certain guidelines or parameters on which television commercials are based on. Thus a prompt here makes a valid point that these commercials should not be allowed towards young children. Hence, I strongly agree with the prompt for the following three reasons.
Firstly, advertising companies aired commercials in and almost every sector of life. It contains the smallest object like a toothbrush to cars which makes it more diverse and intimidate. Moreover, some commercials contain devastating contain which is detrimental to children's mental health. For example, My friend uses to show television to his daughter when she gets upset or starts crying. Because of this habit, she is becoming stalwart on the tv shows and uses to watch commercials in between. After some time she paranoid because of dark commercials.
Secondly, advertising attacks psychology and force you to buy stuff. the impact is much penetrating and devastating. Whatever thing children watch on the tv they started demanding for them and that turns into a very bad habit when parents fulfill that. For instance, my cousin's son watches a lot of television and started erratic behavior of demanding hot car toys. Moreover, she bought those toys for him,. later on, when he grew up my nephew started demanding bigger things like mobile phones and cars at the age of 10.
Moreover, the habit of watching more television will be pernicious to eyes and mental health. Eventually, it will increase strain on the eyes, might augment the spectacle's power. children's mental health is fragile at developing age so it should be nourished well and it is important to shape their mindset with good thought and good habits.
In totality, I agree with the prompt that television commercials should be prohibited towards the children (aged two to five) because it is not only deleterious to the children's upbringing but also their parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ch television commercials are based on. Thus a prompt here makes a valid point that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... psychology and force you to buy stuff. the impact is much penetrating and devastat...
^^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... Moreover, she bought those toys for him,. later on, when he grew up my nephew sta...
^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Later
...reover, she bought those toys for him,. later on, when he grew up my nephew started d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Childrens
...es, might augment the spectacles power. childrens mental health is fragile at developing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21492537313 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80006682923 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594029850746 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2690773562 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1904761905 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9523809524 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274040981225 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650654563903 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957295470894 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169757016257 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11836030093 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.